1983
DOI: 10.3998/mpub.12590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Veiled Species of Hebeloma in the Western United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Collections from the alpine that are very hoary and dark brown have been misinterpreted as H.bruchetii Bon (Miller and Evenson 2001) before molecular techniques; H.bruchetii , first described as an alpine species, has now been synonymized with H.mesophaeum and should have smaller spores. Hebelomamarginatulum is mentioned as a subalpine species (in Idaho) by Smith et al (1983) who described two varieties (ver. fallax, var.…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Collections from the alpine that are very hoary and dark brown have been misinterpreted as H.bruchetii Bon (Miller and Evenson 2001) before molecular techniques; H.bruchetii , first described as an alpine species, has now been synonymized with H.mesophaeum and should have smaller spores. Hebelomamarginatulum is mentioned as a subalpine species (in Idaho) by Smith et al (1983) who described two varieties (ver. fallax, var.…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beker and co-workers (2016) list 25 species occurring in arctic or alpine habitats, 14 of which appear (almost) restricted to these habitats; others also occur in a variety of habitats from subalpine or boreal with coniferous and hardwood trees right down to sand dunes where they grow with dwarf Salix . The veiled species of Hebeloma in Western North America have been treated in a monograph by Smith et al (1983), but few (if any) of their collections are from above treeline, although many are from high elevations in the Rocky Mountains. While recent work on the genus Hebeloma in Europe now provides a basis for comparison of morphological and molecular data for a significant number of species and make possible comparisons of distribution patterns (Vesterholt 2005; Beker et al 2016), much more work is needed before we will have a complete picture of the different species that occur on the different continents and their distribution across those continents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith et al (1983) described 10 varieties of H. mesophaeum in their book based on morphological and anatomical differences especially in the size and shape of the cheilocystidia. In H. mesophaeum, clavate, filamentous, cylindrical, sub-cylindrical and most (Smith et al, 1983). But as far as shape and types of cheilocystidia are concerned the authors' variety is closely related to H. mesophaeum var.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result accepting Anamika as a genus would render Hebeloma polyphyletic. Furthermore the primary distinguishing morphological character for Anamika is the presence of pleurocystidia, which typically are lacking in Hebeloma species (Smith et al 1983, Vesterholt 2005). Yet there are several Australasian Hebeloma species that are pleurocystidiate and cluster in a well-supported clade with the species of Anamika (FIG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%