Abstract:M101 is an ideal target in which to test predictions of massive star birth and evolution. The large abundance gradient across M101 (a factor of 20) suggests that many more WR stars must be found in the inner parts of this galaxy than in the outer regions. Many H ii regions and massive star-forming complexes have been identified in M101; they should be rich in WR stars, and surrounded by RSG stars. Finally, the Wolf-Rayet stars in M101 may be abundant enough for one to explode as a Type Ib or Ic supernova and/o… Show more
“…In any event, the X-ray data rule out the pre-explosion presence, at the location of SN 2011fe, of typical persistent supersoft X-ray sources, but allows the presence of somewhat fainter ones. Shara et al (2013) imaged M101 with HST, including the location of SN 2011fe, in 2010, about 1 year prior to the event, in a narrow band centered on the He II λ4686 line. The hard photon flux from a nuclear-burning accreting WD (see Section 3.1.3, should, in principle, produce a 1-30-parsec-sized (i.e.…”
Type-Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) are important distance indicators, element factories, cosmic-ray accelerators, kinetic-energy sources in galaxy evolution, and endpoints of stellar binary evolution. It has long been clear that a SN Ia must be the runaway thermonuclear explosion of a degenerate carbon-oxygen stellar core, most likely a white dwarf (WD). However, the specific progenitor systems of SNe Ia, and the processes that lead to their ignition, have not been identified. Two broad classes of progenitor binary systems have long been considered: single-degenerate (SD), in which a WD gains mass from a non-degenerate star; and doubledegenerate (DD), involving the merger of two WDs. New theoretical work has enriched these possibilities with some interesting updates and variants. We review the significant recent observational progress in addressing the progenitor problem. We consider clues that have emerged from the observed properties of the various proposed progenitor populations, from studies of their sites -pre-and post-explosion, from analysis of the explosions themselves, and from the measurement of event rates. The recent nearby and well-studied event, SN 2011fe, has been particularly revealing. The observational results are not yet conclusive, and sometimes prone to competing theoretical interpretations. Nevertheless, it appears that DD progenitors, long considered the underdog option, could be behind some, if not all, SNe Ia. We point to some directions that may lead to future progress.
“…In any event, the X-ray data rule out the pre-explosion presence, at the location of SN 2011fe, of typical persistent supersoft X-ray sources, but allows the presence of somewhat fainter ones. Shara et al (2013) imaged M101 with HST, including the location of SN 2011fe, in 2010, about 1 year prior to the event, in a narrow band centered on the He II λ4686 line. The hard photon flux from a nuclear-burning accreting WD (see Section 3.1.3, should, in principle, produce a 1-30-parsec-sized (i.e.…”
Type-Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) are important distance indicators, element factories, cosmic-ray accelerators, kinetic-energy sources in galaxy evolution, and endpoints of stellar binary evolution. It has long been clear that a SN Ia must be the runaway thermonuclear explosion of a degenerate carbon-oxygen stellar core, most likely a white dwarf (WD). However, the specific progenitor systems of SNe Ia, and the processes that lead to their ignition, have not been identified. Two broad classes of progenitor binary systems have long been considered: single-degenerate (SD), in which a WD gains mass from a non-degenerate star; and doubledegenerate (DD), involving the merger of two WDs. New theoretical work has enriched these possibilities with some interesting updates and variants. We review the significant recent observational progress in addressing the progenitor problem. We consider clues that have emerged from the observed properties of the various proposed progenitor populations, from studies of their sites -pre-and post-explosion, from analysis of the explosions themselves, and from the measurement of event rates. The recent nearby and well-studied event, SN 2011fe, has been particularly revealing. The observational results are not yet conclusive, and sometimes prone to competing theoretical interpretations. Nevertheless, it appears that DD progenitors, long considered the underdog option, could be behind some, if not all, SNe Ia. We point to some directions that may lead to future progress.
“…If so, this could bring the WC to WN ratio down to 0.3, about as expected, but would require a surface density of WRs that is 20× greater than that of the LMC. Only two of the new WR candidates had been confirmed by Massey & Holmes (2002) (Shara et al 2013) among others. The problem is, of course, that these galaxies are found at distances ranging from 2.0 Mpc (NGC 300) to 7.0 Mpc (M83, M101), compared to, say, the distance to M33 (0.8 Mpc).…”
Section: The Wolf-rayet Stars: Easy To Find Some But Tough To Find Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former naturally associates the Ib/c's with Wolf-Rayet stars, but there are no cases where an actual progenitor of a Ib or Ic has been identified. (Shara et al 2013 argue that the identification of Wolf-Rayet stars in nearby galaxies serves the additional purpose of identifying Ib/c progenitors, so that when one of these stars explodes we'll be prepared. )…”
The star-forming galaxies of the Local Group act as our laboratories for testing massive star evolutionary models. In this review, I briefly summarize what we believe we know about massive star evolution, and the connection between OB stars, Luminous Blue Variables, yellow supergiants, red supergiants, and WolfRayet stars. The difficulties and recent successes in identifying these various types of massive stars in the neighboring galaxies of the Local Group will be discussed.
“…They are massive stars losing hydrogen envelopes, the socalled Wolf-Rayet stars in observations (Crowther 2007, Shara et al 2013). Since naked helium stars only appear at young age for a short time-scale, they cannot influence the UV-excess of the cluster in the long run.…”
We present GalevNB (Galev for N-body simulations), an utility that converts fundamental stellar properties of N-body simulations into observational properties using the GALEV (GAlaxy EVolutionary synthesis models) package, and thus allowing direct comparisons between observations and N-body simulations. It works by converting fundamental stellar properties, such as stellar mass, temperature, luminosity and metallicity into observational magnitudes for a variety of filters of mainstream instruments/telescopes, such as HST, ESO, SDSS, 2MASS, etc.), and into spectra that spans from far-UV (90 Å) to near-IR (160 µm). As an application, we use GalevNB to investigate the secular evolution of spectral energy distribution (SED) and color-magnitude diagram (CMD) of a simulated star cluster over a few hundred million years. With the results given by GalevNB we discover an UV-excess in the SED of the cluster over the whole simulation time. We also identify four candidates that contribute to the FUV peak, core helium burning stars, thermal pulsing asymptotic giant branch (TPAGB) stars, white dwarfs and naked helium stars.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.