The Varying Role of Vertebrae in Pacific Fishbone Analysis: Comparing Tropical Versus Temperate Midden Assemblages

Abstract

Archaeologists working in the tropical Pacific have demonstrated the feasibility and value of including fish vertebrae in midden analyses, and recent New Zealand studies draw similar conclusions. This work provides an illustrated guide to the identification of vertebrae from key New Zealand fish taxa and shows the effects of including vertebrae on a large fishbone assemblage from southern New Zealand. We note major differences between New Zealand and tropical Pacific assemblages resulting from the inclusion of vertebrae. Unlike the Indo-Pacific taxa of the tropical Pacific, no New Zealand species have been shown to be sensitive to the inclusion of vertebrae. In both places, including vertebrae results in changes in relative abundance and rank order; but in New Zealand, this is a function of processing practices, not fishing behaviours. This work serves to highlight changes in the Polynesian fishing adaption following the colonisation of New Zealand. Copyright

Fish and maize: Bayesian mixing models of fourteenth- through seventeenth-century AD ancestral Wendat diets, Ontario, Canada

“…Fish biomarkers extracted from pottery fabric and encrusted food residues have shown that fish were cooked in the early pottery in several areas of the world 4–7 . Fish skeletal elements and scales are routinely recovered from prehistoric archaeological sites worldwide when fine-scale recovery is implemented 8–11 . Isotopic analyses of human bone frequently indicate fish consumption 12,13 .…”

Archaeological site types, and assemblage size and diversity in Aotearoa New Zealand

“…Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI) was the abundance measure most frequently reported, as noted by others interested in comparative analyses of faunal assemblages (e.g. Harris et al., 2017). Ten of the 18 sites in Table 1 reported this measure for all broad faunal taxonomic classes (bird, fish, mammal, reptile and shellfish, described in Supplementary Data C), thus only those assemblages are considered in this analysis.…”

“…Faunal analysis is well developed in Aotearoa however there are still inconsistencies in recovery methods and different methods of recording (e.g. Campbell, 2016; Harris et al., 2017). As a consequence, we use Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI) summed for general taxonomic groups as the measure that permits comparison of multiple assemblages (Supplementary Data C).…”

Homo sapiens in Island Southeast Asia: Toward a Maritime Specialization?

“…However, recently, a more comprehensive approach has emerged, surpassing this method, involving the identification of all fish remains, including postcranial elements, such as vertebrae. This comprehensive method allows for identification at the highest possible biological level and, when combined with improved reference collections, offers a more precise understanding of ecological data [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. Nonetheless, it is important to note that, despite these advanced methods and extensive reference collections, the specific conditions of the study area often limit the ability to identify fish remains beyond the family level.…”