The Varying Interpretations of Public Interest: Making Sense of Finnish Urban Planners’ Conceptions

Abstract

During the past decades, the concept of public interest has been severely criticized. It nevertheless remains to be a key normative reference point against which public planning may be evaluated and justified. The article claims that there are multiple conceptions of public interest that coexist in everyday planning practice. These conceptions are grounded in the age-old debate on the duties of the State. In the article, four different approaches to public interest were recognized on the basis of two dimensions of the concept. These dimensions are individual/collective and regulation/non-regulation. The theoretical assumptions were tested with interview data of Finnish planning professionals. The coexistence of multiple conceptions of public interest was revealed. This ambiguity makes public interest dubious as a rhetorical tool. Without the explication of the discursive context, the concept is largely devoid of meaning. Thus, when truly seeking justification to planning decisions, with reference to "public interest", the explication of the context and the discursive framework applied is necessary.

“Let us be led by the residents”: Swedish dialogue experts’ stories about power, justification and ambivalence

“…Our findings point towards the need for conducting further research into the justification of dialogue experts' use of power in urban governance. Such research might include three tasks: (1) to further explore how subcategories of dialogue experts justify their actions in different contexts, (2) to observe what kind of actions taken by dialogue experts are found to be socially acceptable by citizens, politicians and other governance actors and (3) to explore how previous theoretical work related to justification and power might help in understanding dialogue practice (see Campbell, 2012;Connelly et al, 2006;Fainstein, 2014;Puustinen, Mäntysalo & Jarenko, 2017).…”

Subnational and Dynamic Conceptualisations of Planning Culture: The Culture of Regional Planning and Regional Planning Cultures in Finland

“…Their responsibilities include the formulation and enactment of regional land use plans and regional development programmes. The central state is represented at the regional level to advise and supervise planning through the Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment (Puustinen et al, 2017 ). However, the understanding of regional planning is not directly derived from the planning system.…”

Planning in no one’s backyard: municipal planners’ discourses of participation in brownfield projects in Helsinki, Amsterdam and Copenhagen

“…This 'welfarism' emphasizes the legal obligations of the municipality and the universalistic principles of providing services for all (Julkunen & Heikkilä 2007). Finnish legal culture gives a political mandate to urban planners' jurisdiction based on institutional trust to defend 'the public interest' (Puustinen et al 2017). However, a gradual change of municipal governance towards New Public Management, where government operations are restructured along market lines adhering to a logic of efficiency and short-term profit, is argued to have been taking place also in Finland since the 1990s (Puustinen et al 2017).…”

“…Finnish legal culture gives a political mandate to urban planners' jurisdiction based on institutional trust to defend 'the public interest' (Puustinen et al 2017). However, a gradual change of municipal governance towards New Public Management, where government operations are restructured along market lines adhering to a logic of efficiency and short-term profit, is argued to have been taking place also in Finland since the 1990s (Puustinen et al 2017). Mattila (2018) points out that neo-liberalisation does not represent a radical break with welfarist planning but continues many of the welfare-statist trajectories in a new form through aiding economic actors and allocating power to private sector actors, such as developers and construction companies, to design participatory processes, which as a result narrows down the municipality's agenda setting in participation.…”