The Varieties of Civilian Praetorianism: Evidence From Sudan’s Coup Politics

Abstract

This study explores the varieties of civilian praetorianism or the different ways in which civilians enable and support military coups. It specifically argues that by shaping their access to different sets of resources, civilians’ proximity to the political establishment and their level of social capital influence their method of support. Civilians linked to the political establishment wield resources better suited for enabling praetorianism through tactics like initiating or plotting coup conspiracies with military officers. Conversely, civilians with high levels of social capital hold resources valuable for consolidating praetorianism through tactics like providing post-coup support and neutralizing anti-coup opposition. Qualitative evidence from three coup episodes in Sudan demonstrates the argument’s plausibility. By explaining the important variation in civilian capabilities and resources, this study advances research on civilian coup involvement, which—although understudied—is critical to understanding coup politics.

Cumhuriyetimizin Yüzüncü Yılında Asker-Sivil İlişkilerine Yeniden Bakmak: Sivillerin Darbe Destekleri ve Cunta Girişimleri

“…Darbelere destek dışında sivil cuntacılık olgusal olarak hem daha az görülmüş hem de akademik olarak daha az incelenmiştir. Sınırlı çalışmalar Ortadoğu ve Asya ülkelerinde darbelere ilişkindir (Kinney, 2018(Kinney, , 2021a(Kinney, , 2021bBen Hammou, 2023;Lorch 2017). Kinney'in son makalelerinden biri (2016) Türkiye'de 15 Temmuz 2016 darbe girişiminde sivillerin darbe planında oynadığı rol üzerinedir.…”