1963
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Variability of Central Neural Activity in a Sensory System, and Its Implications for the Central Reflection of Sensory Events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
107
1

Year Published

1967
1967
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
107
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The intervals were analyzed with regard to the number of bursts that occurred during a 100-spike sampling period along with the calculation of the percentage of spikes fired in bursts. Firing rate, percentage of spikes fired in bursts and variation coefficient (calculated as the ratio between the standard deviation and the mean interval of an ISH and used as a measure of the regularity of firing; Werner and Mountcastle, 1963), were expressed as the median of at least three consecutive ISHs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intervals were analyzed with regard to the number of bursts that occurred during a 100-spike sampling period along with the calculation of the percentage of spikes fired in bursts. Firing rate, percentage of spikes fired in bursts and variation coefficient (calculated as the ratio between the standard deviation and the mean interval of an ISH and used as a measure of the regularity of firing; Werner and Mountcastle, 1963), were expressed as the median of at least three consecutive ISHs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision for neuronal activity to signal the reward magnitude was analyzed in four ways: (1) by evaluating the significance of the difference between the mean spike rates for large and small rewards ( p Ͻ 0.05, t test); (2) by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (significance level of p Ͻ 0.05) (Lusted, 1978) for discrimination between the small and large rewards; (3) by mutual information analysis to estimate the information contained in the spike discharges with respect to the magnitude of the reward (Werner and Mountcastle, 1963;Schreiner et al, 1978;Kitazawa et al, 1998);and (4) by regression analysis of the event parameters contributing to neuronal activities (shown below). The second and third analyses were conducted using a sliding time window of 200 ms moved in 1 ms steps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second analysis, the ensemble activity was averaged across the time in which the monkey drew each segment, rather than in 25 ms bins. In both bin-and segment-based analyses, firing rates were first converted to fractional interspike intervals (31) and then log-transformed, because neuronal responses are commonly proportional to the baseline activity level (32)(33)(34); the log-transformation normalizes distributions of the measurements and stabilizes their variance. Transformed activity patterns were then classified to the segments as above.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%