2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.5b00737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Vaporization Enthalpy and Vapor Pressure of Fenpropidin and Phencyclidine (PCP) at T/K = 298.15 by Correlation Gas Chromatography

Abstract: Vaporization enthalpies and liquid vapor pressures, have been evaluated at T/K = 298.15 for phencyclidine, a hallucinogen (PCP, Angel Dust) and fenpropidin, a fungicide by correlation gas chromatography. Both substances are aliphatic tertiary amines. Vapor pressures of liquid fenpropidin and subcooled liquid phencyclidine have been evaluated over a T/K = 30 temperature range. The fusion enthalpy of phencyclidine has been estimated by a group method and together with its vaporization enthalpy and subcooled liqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(20 reference statements)
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar problems can be observed in some other papers; for example, Table 15 in Gobble et al reveals that the retention time of N , N -dimethyldodecylamine extrapolated to 298 K in run 13 is less than half of that in run 11; differences are even higher in the case of tri- n -octylamine (Table 6 in Gobble et al). However, in most papers reporting vapor pressures by CGC methodology, only averaged t ′(298 K) are tabulated (or in some cases t ′(298 K) are not tabulated at all) and it is not clear whether a similar source of additional uncertainty is present or not.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Literature Cgc Vapor Pressuressupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar problems can be observed in some other papers; for example, Table 15 in Gobble et al reveals that the retention time of N , N -dimethyldodecylamine extrapolated to 298 K in run 13 is less than half of that in run 11; differences are even higher in the case of tri- n -octylamine (Table 6 in Gobble et al). However, in most papers reporting vapor pressures by CGC methodology, only averaged t ′(298 K) are tabulated (or in some cases t ′(298 K) are not tabulated at all) and it is not clear whether a similar source of additional uncertainty is present or not.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Literature Cgc Vapor Pressuressupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Tri- n -butylamine: relative percent error Δ p rel = 100­( p 0(lit) – p GLC )/ p GLC , where p 0(lit) is literature vapor pressures and p GLC is vapor pressures calculated by means of eq with parameters reported by Lipkind et al The same data are presented in Figure in Lipkind et al in ln­( p 0 / p ref ) vs 1/ T form. New p GLC values obtained with a different set of reference compounds by Gobble et al are shown for comparison as a purple dotted line.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Literature Cgc Vapor Pressuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental data of vaporization enthalpies have essentially been extracted for this work from the large collection of Acree, Jr. and Chickos [ 8 ] and Chickos et al [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ], supplemented by recent data from a number of further authors publishing experimental vaporization values of several acetophenones [ 23 ], aliphatic tertiary amines [ 24 ], azidomethyl- N -nitrooxazolidines [ 25 ], benzamides [ 26 ], benzocaine [ 27 ], bisabolol and menthol [ 28 ], crown ethers [ 29 ], N , N -dialkyl monoamides [ 30 ], fenpropidin and phencyclidine [ 31 ], flavors [ 32 ], long-chain fluorinated alcohols [ 33 ], whiskey- and metha-lactone [ 34 ], halogenated fluorenes [ 35 ], ibuprofen and naproxen [ 36 ], imidazo[1,2- a ]pyrazine and phthalazine [ 37 ], insect pheromones [ 38 ], morpholines [ 39 ], organo(thio)phosphates [ 40 ], dialkyl phthalates [ 41 ], nitrogen heteroaromatics [ 42 ], phenylimidazoles [ 43 ], 2-acetylthiophene [ 44 ], dicarboxylic n -pentyl esters [ 45 ], and cyclic amines, ethers and alcohols [ 46 ]. The result of the atom-group parameters, based on 3581 compounds, is summarized in Table 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental data of vaporization enthalpies have essentially been extracted for this work from the large collection of W. E. Acree Jr. and J. S. Chickos [8] and J. S. Chickos et al [10][11][12][13][14], supplemented by recent data from a number of further authors publishing experimental vaporization values of several acetophenones [23], aliphatic tertiary amines [24], azidomethyl-N-nitro-oxazolidines [25], benzamides [26], benzocaine [27], bisabolol and menthol [28], crown ethers [29], N,N-dialkyl monoamides [30], fenpropidin and phencyclidine [31], flavors [32], long-chain fluorinated alcohols [33], whiskey-and methalactone [34], halogenated fluorenes [35], ibuprofen and naproxen [36], imidazo[1,2-a]pyrazine and phthalazine [37], insect pheromones [38], morpholines [39], organo(thio)phosphates [40], dialkyl phthalates [41], nitrogen heteroaromatics [42], phenylimidazoles [43], 2-acetylthiophene [44], dicarboxylic n-pentyl esters [45], and cyclic amines, ethers and alcohols [46]. The result of the atom-group parameters, resting on 3581 compounds, is summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Enthalpy Of Vaporizationmentioning
confidence: 99%