2020
DOI: 10.1093/ej/ueaa065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Vanishing Procyclicality of Labour Productivity

Abstract: We document two changes in postwar US macroeconomic dynamics: the procyclicality of labour productivity vanished, and the relative volatility of employment rose. We propose an explanation for these changes that is based on reduced hiring frictions due to improvements in information about the quality of job matches and the resulting decline in turnover. We develop a simple model with hiring frictions and variable effort to illustrate the mechanisms underlying our explanation. We show that our model qualitativel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
53
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
8
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Real unemployment bene®ts are set as b = 0.4. This is the same value as Shimer (2005) 11 . The disutility of labour is assumed to be c = 0.43.…”
Section: ƒ … †supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Real unemployment bene®ts are set as b = 0.4. This is the same value as Shimer (2005) 11 . The disutility of labour is assumed to be c = 0.43.…”
Section: ƒ … †supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Our rationale is that these models have frictions and shocks that are embedded in a many contemporary DSGE models, and therefore, provide a useful reference point. For labor productivity and labor input dynamics, we consider simulated data from the models in Galí and van Rens () and Garin, Pries, and Sims (), respectively. Our rationale is that since these models successfully explain the decline in the procyclicality of labor productivity after the mid‐1980s, they provide a natural benchmark to determine their intrinsic lead‐lag properties relative to the stylized facts reported above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose the time period 1982–2012, as Gali and van Rens () claim that during this time, labor productivity became less procyclical, opening the door for other mechanisms to be explored. Jermann and Quadrini () use a similar time period in their analysis of financial shocks and the macroeconomy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%