2002
DOI: 10.1067/moe.2002.120056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of Waters' projection for assessing maxillary sinus inflammatory disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A plain sinus radiograph such as the Water's view radiograph is a simple and inexpensive method that has sufficient sensitivity for evaluating the severity of inflammation in maxillary sinuses [26]. Using computed tomography results as the standard criterion, the diagnostic sensitivity of the Water's view radiograph for maxillary sinusitis is approximately 83.3% [27]. When the results of sinus puncture are considered as the diagnostic criterion, the diagnostic sensitivity of the Water's view radiograph for maxillary sinusitis is approximately 90% [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plain sinus radiograph such as the Water's view radiograph is a simple and inexpensive method that has sufficient sensitivity for evaluating the severity of inflammation in maxillary sinuses [26]. Using computed tomography results as the standard criterion, the diagnostic sensitivity of the Water's view radiograph for maxillary sinusitis is approximately 83.3% [27]. When the results of sinus puncture are considered as the diagnostic criterion, the diagnostic sensitivity of the Water's view radiograph for maxillary sinusitis is approximately 90% [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other investigators have demonstrated the superiority of CT when studying patients with sinusitis (24)(25)(26)(27). Data for asthmatic patients with sinus disease are scarce, but studies have shown the superiority of conventional CT over paranasal sinus radiography (28,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a study performed on 134 patients by Waters’ projections and high‐resolution CT in the same day, and using CT as the gold standard, plain radiography had a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 87% (45). In another study on patients with suspected chronic maxillary sinusitis using CT as the reference standard, Waters’ projection had a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 69.2% (46). In children, using nasal endoscopy as a reference, we could observe by Waters’ view radiography a sensitivity of 84.2% and a specificity of 76.6% (47).…”
Section: Imaging Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%