1993
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(05)80295-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of twice yearly bronchoscopy in the work-up and follow-up of patients with laryngeal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rachmat et al studied 170 patients with laryngeal cancer who were followed up by twice yearly bronchoscopy with sputum cytology. 44 Five second primary tumours and six metastases in the lung were discovered. The patients found the procedure unpleasant, an emotional burden and time-consuming.…”
Section: Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rachmat et al studied 170 patients with laryngeal cancer who were followed up by twice yearly bronchoscopy with sputum cytology. 44 Five second primary tumours and six metastases in the lung were discovered. The patients found the procedure unpleasant, an emotional burden and time-consuming.…”
Section: Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 6 However, an attempt to screen for second primaries within the lung using bronchoscopy, in patients previously treated for laryngeal cancer, has proven unsuccessful. 7 Second primaries may also present within the abdomen. McGarry et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increased sensitivity of CT scanning may be of benefit in the long-term follow-up of these patients, although it is worth noting that previous studies have shown no benefit to be gained from using chest x-ray of bronchoscopy in the follow-up of head and neck cancer patients. 14,15 At present, we advocate 1-monthly follow-up for the first year, 2-monthly for the second year, 3-monthly for the third year, and 6-monthly for the following 2 years. The aim of this follow-up is the detection of treatable recurrent disease and the identification of second primary tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%