The value of structured data elements from electronic health records for identifying subjects for primary care clinical trials

Abstract

BackgroundAn increasing number of clinical trials are conducted in primary care settings. Making better use of existing data in the electronic health records to identify eligible subjects can improve efficiency of such studies. Our study aims to quantify the proportion of eligibility criteria that can be addressed with data in electronic health records and to compare the content of eligibility criteria in primary care with previous work.MethodsEligibility criteria were extracted from primary care studies downloaded from the UK Clinical Research Network Study Portfolio. Criteria were broken into elemental statements. Two expert independent raters classified each statement based on whether or not structured data items in the electronic health record can be used to determine if the statement was true for a specific patient. Disagreements in classification were discussed until 100 % agreement was reached. Statements were also classified based on content and the percentages of each category were compared to two similar studies reported in the literature.ResultsEligibility criteria were retrieved from 228 studies and decomposed into 2619 criteria elemental statements. 74 % of the criteria elemental statements were considered likely associated with structured data in an electronic health record. 79 % of the studies had at least 60 % of their criteria statements addressable with structured data likely to be present in an electronic health record. Based on clinical content, most frequent categories were: “disease, symptom, and sign”, “therapy or surgery”, and “medication” (36 %, 13 %, and 10 % of total criteria statements respectively). We also identified new criteria categories related to provider and caregiver attributes (2.6 % and 1 % of total criteria statements respectively).ConclusionsElectronic health records readily contain much of the data needed to assess patients’ eligibility for clinical trials enrollment. Eligibility criteria content categories identified by our study can be incorporated as data elements in electronic health records to facilitate their integration with clinical trial management systems.

Examining the Acceptability of mHealth Technology in HIV Prevention Among High-Risk Drug Users in Treatment

“…Whereas, both participants with and without NCI were equally likely to use cell phone for a number of activities, such as phone calls, text messaging, watching videos, and recording videos. Overall, these findings lend support to the notion that cell phone could be used as a tool to accommodate NCI through its use as a new modality of monitoring and treatment support that may include text messaging [37, 56, 60], phone calls [57, 60], video-based eHealth interventions [61–63], video (or virtually) observed therapy (VOT) [64, 65] targeted specifically for this at-risk populations.…”

Evaluation of Patient-Level Retrieval from Electronic Health Record Data for a Cohort Discovery Task

“…Recall for the structured queries varied widely across topics (Figure 3). There was 100% recall of word-based query relevant patients on 8 of the 56 topics, greater than 50% recall on 35 of the 56 topics, less then 50% recall on 13 of the 56, one topic (48) with no recall of relevant patients, and two topics with no retrieval at all (22,25).…”

“…Another thread of work has focused on making querying easier to carry out, typically through development of natural language or other structured interfaces to the patient data [22][23][24][25]. Other approaches focus on normalizing semantic representation of patient data within the EHR itself [26] and applying deep learning to non-topical characteristics of studies and researchers [27].…”

A Knowledge-Constrained Access Control Model for Protecting Patient Privacy in Hospital Information Systems

“…In the personal health record and health knowledge sharing system design, Lee et al [20] use the Integral Healthcare Enterprise-Cross Enterprise Document Sharing (IHE-XDS) and the W3C Web Ontology Language (OWL) to maintain the Personal Health Records (PHRs) and collate the useful health Web resources related to the personal diseases. Making better use of existing data in the electronic health records to identify eligible subjects can improve efficiency and quality of medical care [21]. Discovering the knowledge from the medical records may support medical personnel in making clinical decisions and also help improve personalized medicine and care [22].…”