2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2011.01214.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Value of Retail‐ and Consumer‐Level Fruit and Vegetable Losses in the United States

Abstract: Food loss at the retail and consumer levels in the United States includes 14.8 billion pounds of fruit and 23.4 billion pounds of vegetables, valued at $15.1 billion and $27.7 billion, respectively, in 2008 retail market prices. The total value of these losses is $42.8 billion per year, or roughly $141 per capita. To most efficiently reduce the annual food loss, it may be beneficial to focus efforts on the four fruits (fresh apples, grapes, peaches and strawberries) and four vegetables (fresh and canned tomato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
96
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2008, the estimated food loss at the retail level in the United States was about 19 billion kilograms (42 billion pounds), valued at $15 billion and equivalent to $50 per capita (Buzby et al, 2011). However, as retailers have a direct contact with their upper and lower levels in the supply chain they are responsible for a bigger fraction of the losses among the system, but those are not easily measurable (Gunders, 2012).…”
Section: Reducing Overall Wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2008, the estimated food loss at the retail level in the United States was about 19 billion kilograms (42 billion pounds), valued at $15 billion and equivalent to $50 per capita (Buzby et al, 2011). However, as retailers have a direct contact with their upper and lower levels in the supply chain they are responsible for a bigger fraction of the losses among the system, but those are not easily measurable (Gunders, 2012).…”
Section: Reducing Overall Wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, there is currently no widespread or discernable social momentum to reduce food waste in the USA [24]. Most consumers are not interested in waste because there is an abundant supply of inexpensive food and because financial incentives, such as tax credits to businesses that donate food, do not currently exist.…”
Section: Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absent detailed food waste statistics specific to California, losses from the state's food supply were estimated from 2008 data on consumers and retailers in the USA [24]. The consumer/retailer sector of the food chain controls post-production waste, which is normally greater in industrialized nations than the waste associated with pre-production activities such as growing, harvesting and storing crops.…”
Section: Wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrating comprehensive cost assessments, as suggested in the framework, may help address this issue. Without extensive cost analyses, it may appear beneficial in terms of labor, time, and money for restaurants to keep excess food in stock so that they never run short, even though this excess is often discarded [49]. Supermarkets keep shelves full even at the expense of throwing out excess food.…”
Section: Perceived High Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%