1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2681(97)00013-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of public information in commodity futures markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research in agricultural futures markets suggests that the release of USDA reports affects price and increases volatility (Fortenbery and Sumner, 1993;Garcia et al, 1997;Isengildina-Massa et al, 2008). This increase in volatility may lead to increases in the BAS on the day of the release.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research in agricultural futures markets suggests that the release of USDA reports affects price and increases volatility (Fortenbery and Sumner, 1993;Garcia et al, 1997;Isengildina-Massa et al, 2008). This increase in volatility may lead to increases in the BAS on the day of the release.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) produces regular crop reports and supply-demand estimates. Research has demonstrated that these releases have significant impact on market price and volatility (Fortenbery and Sumner, 1993;Garcia et al, 1997;Isengildina-Massa et al, 2008). We investigate whether the release of this new public information systematically affects the BAS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, USDA production reports are assumed to contain important and relevant "news." Large and significant futures price reactions after the release of USDA corn and soybean production forecasts indicate that the forecasts provide important new information to the market (e.g., Sumner and Mueller 1989;Garcia et al 1997). 8 It is interesting to note that the ␥ estimates from these regressions equal the inverse of Theil's R-ratio (Theil 1965, pp.…”
Section: Implications Of Smoothing For Forecast Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An explanation of the view of market credibility must necessarily focus on the issue of risk reduction. Garcia et al (1996) reason that traders perceive the USDA reports as containing less risk. McNew and Espinosa (1994) find reduced implied volatility in corn and soybean options after release of USDA crop forecasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%