2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of political connections in opaque firms: Evidence from China's file 18

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Document No. 18 also prohibits government officials from exercising their political influence to create preferential business advantages for companies [9]. This paper defines the year 2013 as the anti-corruption year and test the hypotheses based on statistical differences of the two subgroups of the sample, one for 2008-2012 and the other for 2014-2018.…”
Section: Sample Selection and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Document No. 18 also prohibits government officials from exercising their political influence to create preferential business advantages for companies [9]. This paper defines the year 2013 as the anti-corruption year and test the hypotheses based on statistical differences of the two subgroups of the sample, one for 2008-2012 and the other for 2014-2018.…”
Section: Sample Selection and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reference to Hu et al [9], this paper added control variables such as Age (firm age), Size (firm size), Sales Growth (annual growth of revenues), Board Size (number of directors on the board), IndBoard Ratio (board independence), ROA (return on assets), Booklev (leverage), Cash Flow (cashflows), Tangibility (tangible assets).…”
Section: Sample Selection and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Li et al (2008) and Chen et al (2011), a Chinese firm is considered politically connected when its chairman or general manager is or used to be a government official, has close ties to a current or former government official, or is (used to be) the member of National People's Congress, Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, or the Party Congress. Considering the political system of China, which is classified into different ranks from top to bottom, we constructed an index to evaluate the strength of political connections in China for a more accurate description (Chen et al, 2017;Hu et al, 2019;Peng et al, 2017;Yu et al, 2019). The IPC index of 4-0 was assigned for firms according to the ranks of chairman's or CEO's political connection: "4" for national rank, "3" for provincial rank, "2" for municipal rank, "1" for the county-level rank, and "0" for situations without political connection.…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al (2017) developed the PC Index based on the sum of four components: the chief executive officer (CEO)’s PC, the chairperson’s PC, the director’s PC and the other senior officer’s PC. This PC Index was also used by Hu et al (2019). Other studies used the percentage of board members with PC (Hu et al , 2019; Joni et al , 2020; Shi et al , 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%