2017
DOI: 10.1007/bf03404744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Value of Peer-Evaluation for the Improvement of Quality of the Aerospace Higher Education Across Europe

Abstract: The paper presents the results of a pilot project aiming at proposing a sector-specific quality system that can complement the existing national or European accreditation systems, providing added value to the internal and/or external quality assurance processes that are in place in most EU Universities. In particular, the proposed system implies a site visit from a group of peers to crosscheck and validate the data and documents prepared for the degree course under evaluation. The results of the implementation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Michael G. Eastman et al (2017) studied the efforts of a prominent technical university to attract and retain urban high school graduates. F. Bernelli-Zazzera et al (2017) studied the value of peer evaluation for the improvement of quality of the aerospace higher education across Europe, The proposed system implied a site visit from a group of peers to crosscheck and verify the data and documents prepared for the degree course under evaluation. Aileen Y.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Michael G. Eastman et al (2017) studied the efforts of a prominent technical university to attract and retain urban high school graduates. F. Bernelli-Zazzera et al (2017) studied the value of peer evaluation for the improvement of quality of the aerospace higher education across Europe, The proposed system implied a site visit from a group of peers to crosscheck and verify the data and documents prepared for the degree course under evaluation. Aileen Y.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…exchange enables to share experiences different for every partner, meet cultural differences and improve communication, get to know new approaches for scientific problem-solving, combine unique know-how of the partners and many more benefits [1,2]. the strategic line is, from an internal perspective, to improve the quality of the partners' educational process and curricula to specifically serve the aerospace industry's needs, which are changing [3][4][5]. this means strengthening the cooperation, continuing the harmonisation of the different educational programmes and exchanging of students and staff.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%