2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00373-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of marine ecological data collected by volunteers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
148
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
148
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, observers detected 38 % of the models and ranged from 0 to 75 %, comparable to other work (Foster-Smith and Evans 2003). The majority of models detected were snakes (41 %), followed by frogs (33 %) and lizards (26 %).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On average, observers detected 38 % of the models and ranged from 0 to 75 %, comparable to other work (Foster-Smith and Evans 2003). The majority of models detected were snakes (41 %), followed by frogs (33 %) and lizards (26 %).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Data collected by volunteers often contribute significantly to research projects, especially when guided by experienced scientists (Foster-Smith and Evans 2003). This 'citizen-science' model has also been applied within the tourism industry to generate what has been termed 'conservation voluntourism', 'scientific tourism' or, relatedly, the 'conservation holiday' (Brown and Morrison 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, data inconsistency may result from volunteers' lack of experience, inadequate guidelines and insufficient training [4], "rolled up" into larger monitoring projects [6]. Training, while generally desirable, may not always be possible, especially for low budget projects.…”
Section: The Challenge -Facilitating Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, given the expertise and language gap between scientists and ordinary people, information transfer in citizen science projects is not straightforward. While citizen scientists can offer insights and generate new ideas [4], their lack of training and expertise results in inconsistent and incorrect data [5,6,7]. In particular, where direct elicitation of people's opinions is required we can expect lower scientific accuracy of data as wider audiences with lesser expertise get engaged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%