1998
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199802150-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Value of Lumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Demonstration of Anular Tears

Abstract: These results confirm that the high-intensity zone is a marker of a painful posterior anular tear. However, the usefulness of this sign is limited by low sensitivity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
60
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
60
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant association between HIZ and discogenic pain was not found in contrary to many previous studies [1,6,9,10,15,26]. Granulation tissue is likely to change over time rendering this study an edge, since MRI and discography were performed within 24 h. The time interval between the two procedures varied between 4 weeks [5] and 5 months [13] in the previous studies correlating HIZ and discography findings, and could be a possible explanation of the discrepancy with this study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Significant association between HIZ and discogenic pain was not found in contrary to many previous studies [1,6,9,10,15,26]. Granulation tissue is likely to change over time rendering this study an edge, since MRI and discography were performed within 24 h. The time interval between the two procedures varied between 4 weeks [5] and 5 months [13] in the previous studies correlating HIZ and discography findings, and could be a possible explanation of the discrepancy with this study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Granulation tissue is likely to change over time rendering this study an edge, since MRI and discography were performed within 24 h. The time interval between the two procedures varied between 4 weeks [5] and 5 months [13] in the previous studies correlating HIZ and discography findings, and could be a possible explanation of the discrepancy with this study. The PPV of HIZ in terms of exactly reproduced pain was only 39 % compared to, between 83 and 95 % [1,6,[9][10][11] in studies favoring HIZ as a reliable marker of discogenic pain. Among numerous authors correlating HIZ and discogenic pain [1, 2, 4-13, 15, 26], only Carragee et al [5] and O'Neill et al [8] used PCD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They believed that the HIZ in patients with low back pain is likely to represent painful internal disc disruption. Saifuddin et al [15] found that the clinical significance of the HIZ was limited as its sensitivity was as low as 26.7%. Ricketson et al [12] found no correlation between the presence of an HIZ and discographically identified annular tears.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%