2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of intraoperative frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study sensitivity was higher for T2/3 tumors compared with T1 tumors showing a significant correlation (p<0.01) between tumor size and FS sensitivity. These results are comparable with those reported by Chan et al [35] and by Weiser et al [28], who found a significant increase of sensitivity of FS with tumor size, but are in contrast with those of other authors [36] who report the highest sensitivity of FS in T1a and T1b tumors, finding no significant difference between the sensitivity regarding T1a/b, T1c, and T2/3 tumors. In any case, we believe that intraoperative FS of SLN is, worthwhile, even in patients with small tumors, since SLN involvement >10% is reported in the larger tumors in the 5 to 15 mm range [37], therefore, making an ALND necessary.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study sensitivity was higher for T2/3 tumors compared with T1 tumors showing a significant correlation (p<0.01) between tumor size and FS sensitivity. These results are comparable with those reported by Chan et al [35] and by Weiser et al [28], who found a significant increase of sensitivity of FS with tumor size, but are in contrast with those of other authors [36] who report the highest sensitivity of FS in T1a and T1b tumors, finding no significant difference between the sensitivity regarding T1a/b, T1c, and T2/3 tumors. In any case, we believe that intraoperative FS of SLN is, worthwhile, even in patients with small tumors, since SLN involvement >10% is reported in the larger tumors in the 5 to 15 mm range [37], therefore, making an ALND necessary.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The reported sensitivity of FS for the detection of SLN micrometastasis ranges from 10% to 52% [15,20,[28][29][30]. In a recent study on a large series of breast cancer patients, van de Vrande et al [36] report that the sensitivity of the FS examination was significantly greater when SLN contained macrometastasis compared to micrometastasis (84.0% versus 61.1%, p<0.001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We have previously discussed this point and concluded that multislice frozen section analysis was superior to imprint cytology in an intraoperative diagnosis of cancer metastasis in SN, even if it is a micrometastasis [8]. A review of the relevant literature on SN biopsies of breast cancer and melanoma conWrms why intraoperative frozen sections are so widely accepted [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…48 Several studies have demonstrated that frozen section is less sensitive and assertive in detecting micrometastases (61.1%) than macrometastases (84%), with an overall sensitivity and specificity of 71.6% and 100%, respectively. 49 The efficacy of the current and standard histologic and immunohistochemical techniques in identifying occult metastasis has been questioned. As the driving force behind such reports, SN micrometastases seem to be implicated in cases of axillary recurrence.…”
Section: Pathologic Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%