2014
DOI: 10.1177/0284185113494982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI for prediction of grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Abstract: Abdominal MRI with DWI may be useful for differentiating benign pancreatic NETs from non-benign pancreatic NETs, which might be helpful for determination of parenchyma-preserving resection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, some PanNENs may present intratumoral fibrosis, and even if well differentiated, they can demonstrate low ADC values. On the other hand, G2 and G3 PanNENs with loose or no fibrosis could present relatively higher ADC values [17]. This aspect was explained well by Wang et al [18]; in their study, there was a difference in mean ADCs between well-differentiated endocrine tumors and endocrine carcinomas, but a significant inverse correlation between ADC values and the cellularity of endocrine tumors was only observed after excluding three well-differentiated endocrine tumors with benign behavior and marked fibrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, some PanNENs may present intratumoral fibrosis, and even if well differentiated, they can demonstrate low ADC values. On the other hand, G2 and G3 PanNENs with loose or no fibrosis could present relatively higher ADC values [17]. This aspect was explained well by Wang et al [18]; in their study, there was a difference in mean ADCs between well-differentiated endocrine tumors and endocrine carcinomas, but a significant inverse correlation between ADC values and the cellularity of endocrine tumors was only observed after excluding three well-differentiated endocrine tumors with benign behavior and marked fibrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is increasingly being used in body applications for the detection and characterization of pancreatic lesions and for the assessment of hepatic metastases. Despite this fact, relatively few studies, including small numbers of patients, have been conducted regarding its usefulness in the evaluation of patients with PanNENs [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21], and they provided somehow contradictory results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the newly introduced hybrid technique PET/MRI has not yet resulted in an increased sensitivity compared to the stand-alone techniques [89]. DWI for oncologic imaging is based on the restricted diffusion of water molecules in highly cellular tissue such as tumors and has shown potential for distinguishing exocrine and endocrine pancreatic tumors [90] and G1 from G2-G3 pancreatic neuroendocrine lesions by means of quantifying the tumor's apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the images (ADC map) [91]. ADC has been shown to correlate with Ki67 [92].…”
Section: Novel Techniques and Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details regarding ADC measurements correlations with the grade of differentiation are reported in Table 2. Overall, it seems that ADC values are correlated with the Ki67 labeling index: G3 PanNETs tend to present lower mean ADC values compared to well-differentiated PanNETs [58][59][60] . As for PDACs, staging plays a fundamental for treatment planning and prognostication of PanNETs.…”
Section: Pancreatic Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Etchebehere et al [67] compared WBDWI with 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT and 99mTc-HYNICOctreotide SPECT-CT: WBDWI had a similar accuracy when compared to molecular imaging techniques for lung and liver lesions, while showed a higher false-negative rate for bone lesions. Schraml et al [68] reported that PET-CT and WBDWI had comparable overall detection rates for NETs metastases but Wang et al [43] 21 0, 500 PDAC 2.10 (WD-MD); 1.46 (PD) Legrand et al [44] 22 Wang et al [58] 18 0, 50, 500 PanNET 1.75 (G1); 1.00 (G3) Jang et al [59] 20 0, 800 PanNET 1.48 (G1-G2); 1.04 (G3) Hwang et al [60] 44 significantly differed in organ-based detection rates with superiority of PET-CT for lymph node and pulmonary lesions and of WBDWI for liver and bone metastases. Experimental applications of pCT to PanNETs reported interesting results.…”
Section: Pancreatic Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%