2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4782-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for differentiation between hepatic microabscesses and metastases in patients with periampullary cancer

Abstract: • Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is useful for distinguishing hepatic microabscess from metastasis. • Hepatic microabscess showed significant size discrepancy ≥30% between T1WI and HBPI. • Arterial rim enhancement persistent through the TP indicates hepatic microabscess.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Diagnosing liver metastasis is a challenge in EHD cancer patients because small biliary abscesses frequently coexist due to biliary obstruction. The findings from previous studies suggest that patchy parenchymal enhancement, arterial rim enhancement persistent through portal venous phase and perilesional hyperemia on CT and MR, and size discrepancy between T1WI and T2WI as well as T1WI and the hepatobiliary phase on MR are indicative of biliary abscess rather than liver metastasis (108,109). Short-term follow-up with imaging can also help radiologists to assess lesional size changes.…”
Section: Kq 10 How Do We Evaluate Distant Metastasis In Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosing liver metastasis is a challenge in EHD cancer patients because small biliary abscesses frequently coexist due to biliary obstruction. The findings from previous studies suggest that patchy parenchymal enhancement, arterial rim enhancement persistent through portal venous phase and perilesional hyperemia on CT and MR, and size discrepancy between T1WI and T2WI as well as T1WI and the hepatobiliary phase on MR are indicative of biliary abscess rather than liver metastasis (108,109). Short-term follow-up with imaging can also help radiologists to assess lesional size changes.…”
Section: Kq 10 How Do We Evaluate Distant Metastasis In Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DWI high signal in the center of the hepatic abscess lesions could be explained by the increased restriction of diffusion of high-viscosity pus in the central area. 20 In our study, there were only two (4.7%) cases of atypical hepatic abscesses with high SI and ADC values, an effect known as “T2 shine-through,” while the surrounding area of the malignant tumors showed diffusion limitation. Abscesses can lead to decreased cellularity and increased extracellular fluid in the periphery, secondary to inflammation, leading to prolonged T2 relaxation time without diffusion restriction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Choi et al have found that parts of hepatic microabscesses are invisible on unenhanced T1-weighted images (T1WIs). 20 Recent evidence has suggested a non-defect of the arterial enhancing rim on hepatobiliary phase imaging (HBPI) in gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid–enhanced MRI, which means the SI of the rim may be lower than that of the surrounding liver parenchyma and higher than that of the central portion. 14 In other words, the boundary between the liver parenchyma and abscess is blurred due to the same SI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only on day 7 were the lesions observed. In such cases, contrast MRI is considered more accurate in de ining and characterizing the indings [23]. Truly, a subsequent MRI established the diagnosis of micro-abscesses in the present case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%