1990
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.155.4.2119107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in the management of bile duct stones.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have reported clearance rates varying from 40% (two of five patients)9 to 67% (six of nine)20 in patients with intrahepatic stones treated with ESWL. In this study, stone clearance was achieved in all nine cases with intrahepatic stones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Previous studies have reported clearance rates varying from 40% (two of five patients)9 to 67% (six of nine)20 in patients with intrahepatic stones treated with ESWL. In this study, stone clearance was achieved in all nine cases with intrahepatic stones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has been put forward as a non-surgical method of treating bile duct stones where alternative methods are unsuccessful. 37 ESWL has an advantage over other forms of stone treatment in that direct contact with the stone is not necessary. All patients should have a sphincterotomy prior to ESWL to allow clearance of residual small stone fragments.…”
Section: Extracorporeal Shock-wave Lithotripsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General anesthesia or intravenous sedation is generally necessary. 37 ESWL is not, however, approved for general use in the treatment of choledocholithiasis in the United States.…”
Section: Extracorporeal Shock-wave Lithotripsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method of treatment clears retained bile duct stones in 60-90% of patients, although some patients require repeated treatments. [16][17][18][19][20][21] Mortality associated with ESWL ranges from 0-2%. Major adverse effects are uncommon even in the elderly.…”
Section: Mechanical Lithotripsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major adverse effects are uncommon even in the elderly. [16][17][18][19][20][21] Cost is the major drawback with ESWL, particularly as there are several cheap and equally effective non-surgical alternatives. Furthermore, capital investment in ESWL is becoming even less attractive because laparoscopic cholecystectomy is rapidly reducing the indications for ESWL in biliary disease in general.…”
Section: Mechanical Lithotripsymentioning
confidence: 99%