2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of environmental status signaling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
46
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…From the perspective of signaling theory, a person who is displaying a green everyday good that is somewhat costlier than its nongreen counterpart (e.g., a rucksack made from recycled material) can signal that he or she can afford to pay this “green premium” (Costa, Zepeda, & Sirieix, ; Elliott, ; Griskevicius et al, ). According to signaling theory, it is not the absolute cost of a product that counts but the product's premium (whether a luxury premium or a green premium) relative to a typical conventional product (Delgado, Harriger, & Khanna, ; Przepiorka & Berger, ). Griskevicius et al () demonstrate this point in a laboratory experiment.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the perspective of signaling theory, a person who is displaying a green everyday good that is somewhat costlier than its nongreen counterpart (e.g., a rucksack made from recycled material) can signal that he or she can afford to pay this “green premium” (Costa, Zepeda, & Sirieix, ; Elliott, ; Griskevicius et al, ). According to signaling theory, it is not the absolute cost of a product that counts but the product's premium (whether a luxury premium or a green premium) relative to a typical conventional product (Delgado, Harriger, & Khanna, ; Przepiorka & Berger, ). Griskevicius et al () demonstrate this point in a laboratory experiment.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, green premiums and luxury premiums cannot be equated because demonstrative green consumption does not merely signal social status: It can also signal prosocial values and cooperativeness because only a person who cares about the environment and thus, about the public, is willing to pay a premium for a green good, for which a cheaper nongreen counterpart exists (Whitfield, ). For example, a buyer of a low‐emissions hybrid car is willing to pay a premium in order to reduce global CO2 emissions (Delgado et al, ; Thaler & Sunstein, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have highlighted the symbolic value of pro-environmental behaviors (Noppers et al, 2014) and noted that behaviors can vary in their symbolic significance, which has important implications for how these behaviors are perceived and adopted (Sütterlin and Siegrist, 2014). Other studies suggest that being seen as environmentally friendly has social value and that status considerations can motivate high-cost, 'green' consumption (Delgado et al, 2015;Griskevicius et al, 2010;Sexton and Sexton, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Beyond sexual attraction, other forms of conspicuous consumption have been identified, such as conspicuous altruism and conspicuous conservatism (Zabkar and Hosta 2013;Griskevicius, Tybur, and Van den Bergh 2010;Sexton and Sexton 2014;Delgado, Harriger, and Khanna 2015). Essentially it is argued that individuals act altruistic or conserve resources conspicuously to show that they can "waste" excess resources and increase their social status (Griskevicius, Tybur, and Van den Bergh 2010).…”
Section: Conspicuous Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexton & Sexton consider the additional conspicuous value of a Prius, finding that depending on the region, the conspicuous aspects of the Prius could result in additional willingness-to-pay of $400 to $4,000 per car (Sexton and Sexton 2014). Another regression model found that the Prius had an average additional value of about $500 due to its conspicuous value (Delgado, Harriger, and Khanna 2015). Sovacool similarly examined conceptual frameworks for electric mobility, and noted that social and non-monetary aspects play a prominent role in diffusion; as one expert interviewed for the paper noted, " [p]eople are more likely to adopt an electric vehicle when they believe doing so will enhance their status"(B. K. Sovacool 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%