“…Legal structures that prevent employees from taking knowledge from a firm reduce employee mobility. For example, when firms implement non-compete agreements to constrain the ability of an employee to leave the firm and compete with the employer (Buenstorf, Engel, Fischer, & Gueth, 2016;Starr, 2016) or threaten intellectual property enforcement to prevent an employee from using the firm's knowledge in a different context (Ganco, Ziedonis, & Agarwal, 2015), they not only inhibit the willingness of employees to move to an existing firm (Agarwal, Ganco, & Ziedonis, 2009;Fallick, Fleischman, & Rebitzer, 2006;Ganco et al, 2015;Marx, 2011;Marx et al, 2009;Samila & Sorenson, 2011;Yeganegi, Laplume, Dass, & Huynh, 2016;Younge & Marx, 2016), but they also inhibit employees from forming their own firms by preventing employee entrepreneurs from imitating important aspects of their parent firm (Anton & Yao, 1995;Yeganegi et al, 2016). Intellectual property protection, thus, reduces the entrepreneurial aspirations of employees (Autio & Acs, 2010) and constrains the ability of employees to become entrepreneurs (Hellmann, 2007), especially if the parent firm values the intellectual property highly (Gambardella, Ganco, & Honoré, 2014).…”