2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20161-0_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Value of Earth Observations: Methods and Findings on the Value of Landsat Imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, our work to increase access to the elusive broad‐extent/fine‐grain observational domain with a mental model and an open workflow is an important but incomplete effort toward accessible macroecology. Illustrating this point, the reduced cost of Landsat images brought more researchers into the user base from lower resourced institutions and underrepresented parts of the world to do more topically diverse science (Nagaraj et al, 2020), but some barriers to access still exist (Miller et al, 2016). For instance, three quarters of users are men, and 65% of users are academic researchers (Miller et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, our work to increase access to the elusive broad‐extent/fine‐grain observational domain with a mental model and an open workflow is an important but incomplete effort toward accessible macroecology. Illustrating this point, the reduced cost of Landsat images brought more researchers into the user base from lower resourced institutions and underrepresented parts of the world to do more topically diverse science (Nagaraj et al, 2020), but some barriers to access still exist (Miller et al, 2016). For instance, three quarters of users are men, and 65% of users are academic researchers (Miller et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Illustrating this point, the reduced cost of Landsat images brought more researchers into the user base from lower resourced institutions and underrepresented parts of the world to do more topically diverse science (Nagaraj et al, 2020), but some barriers to access still exist (Miller et al, 2016). For instance, three quarters of users are men, and 65% of users are academic researchers (Miller et al, 2016). The Landsat archive was undeniably made more accessible to the collective benefit of science and society (Miller, 2016; Nagaraj et al, 2020), but even broader access (and therefore greater value; Miller, 2016) is possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%