2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02245.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of customised centiles in assessing perinatal mortality risk associated with parity and maternal size

Abstract: Objective We wanted to compare customised and population standards for defining smallness for gestational age (SGA) in the assessment of perinatal mortality risk associated with parity and maternal size.Design Population-based cohort study.Setting Sweden.Population Swedish Birth Registry database 1992-1995 with 354 205 complete records.Method Coefficients were derived and applied to determine SGA by the fully customised method, or by adjustment for fetal sex only, and using the same fetal weight standard.Main … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
162
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
162
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some newborns are constitutionally small rather than growth restricted and their prognosis is less likely to be influenced by SGA status (32). We were unable to differentiate constitutionally small newborns from FGR newborns due to lack of data on prepregnancy maternal weight which is a crucial factor when defining constitutional smallness (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some newborns are constitutionally small rather than growth restricted and their prognosis is less likely to be influenced by SGA status (32). We were unable to differentiate constitutionally small newborns from FGR newborns due to lack of data on prepregnancy maternal weight which is a crucial factor when defining constitutional smallness (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We read with interest the paper by Audureau et al 1 We note that following their interventions (prophylactic syntocinon, blood-collecting bags and sulprostone) that the incidence of major postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) did not significantly alter (0.81% in 2003 and 0.86% in 2005). Unfortunately, in our unit, a tertiary referral unit delivering about 5200 women a year, we identified a rise in the rate of PPH from 0.39% in 2003 to 0.66% in 2005, and then to 1.22% in 2008.…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Audureau et al 1 defined major PPH as the presence of one or more of the following criteria: blood transfusion of at least one unit, surgery for uterine conservation, and hysterectomy. As suggested by Audureau et al, 1 it may be that their interventions did not alter the incidence of PPH because of an underlying rise in PPH that was prevented, or contained, by the interventions.…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the reference ranges for fetal biometric data and birth weight account for maternal height, weight, ethnicity, parity and fetal gender (thus better identifying fetal growth potential), the detection of IUGR is enhanced 6 . Growth potential percentiles have been shown to be superior to conventional reference ranges for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome 7 , 8 . The GROW (gestation related optimal weight) software has customised data for different countries (including Australia), and is able to be downloaded from www.gestation.net.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%