1999
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/14.6.1564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose rhabdomyolysis in acute renal failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
16
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When a patient is not admitted immediately, recognition and evaluation of rhabdomyolysis may become difficult. Reports suggest that over one-quarter of patients with rhabdomyolysis are not clinically diagnosed [3,4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When a patient is not admitted immediately, recognition and evaluation of rhabdomyolysis may become difficult. Reports suggest that over one-quarter of patients with rhabdomyolysis are not clinically diagnosed [3,4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Review of medical records has shown that MR images can be used to effectively localise muscle lesions in rhabdomyolysis and assess extent [4,[7][8][9][10][11][12]. MRI has been shown to be more sensitive for detection of rhabdomyolysis skeletal muscle lesions than ultrasonography and CT [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these are nonspecific imaging findings that can also be seen in pyomyositis and infiltrative intramuscular neoplasms. (7,10,11) On ultrasonography, affected muscle groups generally appear hypoechoic, with effacement of the normal striated architecture of the muscle fibres, although these findings are also nonspecific. (11,12) In the absence of relevant clinical history and laboratory markers, radiological findings of rhabdomyolysis may be difficult to distinguish from those of inflammatory myopathy, muscle infection, necrotising fasciitis or other conditions associated with myonecrosis such as diabetes mellitus or sickle cell crisis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding has been reported on CT in many cases and has been postulated secondary to calcium deposition. 2,3 CT and MR findings of rhabdomyolysis are nonspecific and may be secondary to edema and/or inflammation. Similar findings have been reported in polymyositis, dermatomyositis, mild injuries, infections, myositis, radiation therapy, acute denervation, compartment syndrome, early myositis ossificans, and sickle cell crisis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar findings have been reported in polymyositis, dermatomyositis, mild injuries, infections, myositis, radiation therapy, acute denervation, compartment syndrome, early myositis ossificans, and sickle cell crisis. 2,3,8 In general, it may be reasonable to consider that patients with acute rhabdomyolysis undergo imaging studies if they have symptoms suggesting a compartment syndrome or if their disease is sufficiently extensive as to cause devastating renal damage. Later, in the chronic stage, imaging studies are useful for supporting the diagnosis, evaluating the extent of the pathology, and guiding muscle biopsies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%