1976
DOI: 10.1016/0007-6813(76)90056-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of behaviorally based performance appraisals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scale for each responsibility is divided into a number of valucs ranging from low to high (e.g., One, Unacceptable, to Five, Excellent). Each value is assigned one or more statements that are used as "anchors" to describe the value (Schneier & Beatty, 1979;Kearney, 1976). For example, for the job responsibility of coordinating staff meetings, an excellent rating could be anchored with the following phrase: "Consistently plans and conducts staff meetings in a professional manner through the use of predeveloped agendas, encouragement of staff input, issue-directed discussion, and prompt beginning and closure of meetings."…”
Section: Beha Viortuly Anchoiped Rating Scales Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale for each responsibility is divided into a number of valucs ranging from low to high (e.g., One, Unacceptable, to Five, Excellent). Each value is assigned one or more statements that are used as "anchors" to describe the value (Schneier & Beatty, 1979;Kearney, 1976). For example, for the job responsibility of coordinating staff meetings, an excellent rating could be anchored with the following phrase: "Consistently plans and conducts staff meetings in a professional manner through the use of predeveloped agendas, encouragement of staff input, issue-directed discussion, and prompt beginning and closure of meetings."…”
Section: Beha Viortuly Anchoiped Rating Scales Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%