2019
DOI: 10.1080/21606544.2019.1617196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of a statistical life in Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the results showed that scaling up the SBIRT program in Mexico would have resulted in up to 16,000 avoided alcohol‐attributable deaths over the course of 10 years (scenario 5), translated into an investment ranging between Int$14,000 and Int$26,000 per delayed death. These values are substantially below the value of statistical life in Mexico (i.e., willingness to pay for reducing the statistical incidence of one premature death in a society) estimated in a recent study by De Lima at Int$210,880 [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Also, the results showed that scaling up the SBIRT program in Mexico would have resulted in up to 16,000 avoided alcohol‐attributable deaths over the course of 10 years (scenario 5), translated into an investment ranging between Int$14,000 and Int$26,000 per delayed death. These values are substantially below the value of statistical life in Mexico (i.e., willingness to pay for reducing the statistical incidence of one premature death in a society) estimated in a recent study by De Lima at Int$210,880 [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Finally, the PAF from each scenario was multiplied with the corresponding expected number of premature deaths in the population to obtain the number of attributable premature deaths. For the economic assessment, the value of statistical life was used to estimate the economic impacts of preventing deaths in each scenario, using the value of statistical life reported for Mexico (US $210,880) [ 33 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We multiplied VSL values by the number of avoidable deaths, which is required to better understand the money cost of the number of deaths by total and cardiovascular mortality. The VSL estimator compares, under a common unit of value, the cost and the benefits of introducing public policy aiming to reduce mortality rates due to air pollution [64]. Although VSL is debatable for ascribing monetary value to human life, this approach quantifies life for statistical and resource allocation purposes, allowing to explain the cost of death.…”
Section: Hia and The European Aphekom Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%