“…Further, given the preponderance of prior UK returns-based analyses, the use of a different methodology is a useful way of extending prior work on the value relevance of cash flows and accruals. Certainly, there have been plenty of other UK studies using levels-based designs in other value relevance studies in the recent past including, for example, Green, Stark, and Thomas (1996), with respect to research and development expenditures, Rees (1997), with respect to dividends, debt and investment, Garrod and Rees (1998), with respect to international diversification and segmental disclosures, Citron (2001), with respect to deferred taxation, Akbar and Stark (2003), with respect to dividends and capital contributions, and Shah, Akbar, and Stark (2009) with respect to advertising expenditures. Jiang and Stark (2011) study the valuation of loss firms in the UK and, similar to the analysis of Darrough and Ye (2007) in the US, find that the size of loss is value irrelevant in the UK.…”