The Validity of Time-Sampling in Group Interactions

Billings, Andrew C.; McDowell, Samuel W.; Gomberg, Christopher A.; Kessler, Marc L.; Weiner, Sheldon

doi:10.1080/00224545.1978.9924064

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Data Collection2

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1979

2003

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Because of the time and expense involved in the coding group meetings, only 25 percent of each meeting was coded. The strategy to employ a subset of a group's communication exchanges has been validated [6] as well as employed in past CMCS research (e.g., [90,101]). Billings et al [6] reported validity coefficients of 0.8 or better for four-category interaction process analysis (IPA) coding in a 20 percent subset of the total interaction.…”

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The strategy to employ a subset of a group's communication exchanges has been validated [6] as well as employed in past CMCS research (e.g., [90,101]). Billings et al [6] reported validity coefficients of 0.8 or better for four-category interaction process analysis (IPA) coding in a 20 percent subset of the total interaction. Moreover, a comparison of four-category IPA coding to 12-category IPA coding suggested that fewer categories require smaller subsets to achieve a given level of validity.…”

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation