2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validity of the heat tolerance test in prediction of recurrent exertional heat illness events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in the French military, 15.4% of the patients experiencing EHS reported a previous EHS episode (Abriat et al 2014). More recently, another study reported an incidence of 4.1% of recurrent exertional heat illness episodes in a cohort of 145 patients (Schermann et al 2018). Likewise, US active military personnel, who experienced EHS in the previous year, had a 7.3 times greater chance of getting a second EHS episode (Mayer TA, King MA, Bedno SA, Ward MD, Leon LR, unpublished observations).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the French military, 15.4% of the patients experiencing EHS reported a previous EHS episode (Abriat et al 2014). More recently, another study reported an incidence of 4.1% of recurrent exertional heat illness episodes in a cohort of 145 patients (Schermann et al 2018). Likewise, US active military personnel, who experienced EHS in the previous year, had a 7.3 times greater chance of getting a second EHS episode (Mayer TA, King MA, Bedno SA, Ward MD, Leon LR, unpublished observations).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether it has long-term impacts on epigenetics or health is not entirely clear. Epidemiological data suggest that heat stroke exposure is associated with increased susceptibility to a second heat stroke (Abriat et al 2014;Schermann et al 2018) and a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease, renal failure or other severe health disorders later in life (Wallace et al 2007;Wang et al 2019;Laitano et al 2020;Tseng et al 2020). Furthermore, in athletes previously exposed to heat illness, heat shock protein responsiveness of blood leukocytes is blunted, when evaluated at least 6 months after exposure (Ruell et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this relatively long recovery period remained unchanged until recently for 2 main reasons. First, the protocol served for many years as a safety tool in RTD decisions, 16 preventing a premature RTD. Second, although most clinical guidelines recommended return to gradual activity only 7 to 21 days after clinical recovery, 9,10,14 no evidence has shown that clinical recovery is an accurate indicator of the function of the thermoregulatory mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IDF has used this test for the last 4 decades because it is simple, safe, and reliable (98.2% of participants who had had a negative HTT did not experience a repeat EHI). 4 The raw data obtained during the test were analyzed for many years by an experienced physiologist or physician. This requirement was a major disadvantage, which has recently been addressed by applying computational methods for the objective interpretation of results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%