2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validity of questionnaire self‐report of psychopathology and parent–child relationship quality in juvenile delinquents with psychiatric disorders

Abstract: The present study focuses on the validity of questionnaire self‐report of psychopathology and parent–child relationship quality for juvenile delinquents with severe behavioural and psychiatric disorders by comparing information derived from questionnaire self‐report with information from other sources, including parent report, in‐depth interviewing, behavioural observation by clinicians, and official criminal records. The sample consisted of N=33 juvenile delinquents with psychiatric disorders. The juvenile de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
42
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(32 reference statements)
2
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a fourth limitation of this study is that the assessment of morally relevant behaviour was based on questionnaire self report. Despite possible under-reporting of antisocial behaviour in juvenile delinquents (Breuk et al 2007), there is empirical support for the reliability and validity of questionnaire self report of antisocial behaviour in adolescents (Junger-Tas and Hean Marshall 1999;Singh 1979;Verhulst and Van der Ende 1992). Moreover, we found significant differences between delinquent and non-delinquent adolescents in norm trespassing and externalizing behaviour, which finding is in line with that in studies showing correspondence between officially recorded offending and self report of delinquency (Emler and Reicher 1995;Gold 1970).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, a fourth limitation of this study is that the assessment of morally relevant behaviour was based on questionnaire self report. Despite possible under-reporting of antisocial behaviour in juvenile delinquents (Breuk et al 2007), there is empirical support for the reliability and validity of questionnaire self report of antisocial behaviour in adolescents (Junger-Tas and Hean Marshall 1999;Singh 1979;Verhulst and Van der Ende 1992). Moreover, we found significant differences between delinquent and non-delinquent adolescents in norm trespassing and externalizing behaviour, which finding is in line with that in studies showing correspondence between officially recorded offending and self report of delinquency (Emler and Reicher 1995;Gold 1970).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The results, however, remained the same after we had repeated the analyses with a 'clean' comparison group. Nevertheless, removing adolescents with high scores on norm trespassing and externalizing behaviour from the comparison group may not have been sufficient, since juvenile offenders who have not been officially recorded as delinquent may systematically under-report socially undesirable behaviour (Breuk et al 2007). Therefore, a fourth limitation of this study is that the assessment of morally relevant behaviour was based on questionnaire self report.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obedience and adaptation alignment ('playing it cool together', Goffman 1961) could lead to underreporting of fears at the workplace in questionnaires ('on paper'). The problems, associated with the use of self-report questionnaires in secure accommodations have already been established for inmates (Breuk, Clauser, Stams, Slot, & Doreleijers, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, several studies showed a discrepancy between cognition (knowing the difference between right and wrong) and behavior (nevertheless behaving aggressively, e.g., [49,50]. In order to recognize and internalize consequences of one's behaviour, one must first restore self-esteem and self-worth [51]. Treatment should therefore focus on restoring self-esteem to improve behavioural evaluation eventually leading to more adequate interpretations of one's surroundings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, with exception of the computer task, instruments were mainly self-reports. Research has shown that especially within forensic samples, self-report might not be the most reliable method of assessment [32,51]. Therefore, future research regarding negative and aggressive interpretation bias might include more implicit, real life measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%