2013
DOI: 10.1137/120892283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Validity of Johnson--Nédélec's BEM--FEM Coupling on Polygonal Interfaces

Abstract: In this short article we prove that the classical one-equation (or Johnson-Nédélec) coupling of finite and boundary elements can be applied with a Lipschitz coupling interface. Because of the way it was originally approached from the analytical standpoint, this BEM-FEM scheme has generally required smooth boundaries and hence produced a consistency error in the finite element part. With a variational argument, we prove that this requirement is not needed and that stability holds for all pairs of discrete space… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other two methods we will discuss in this work are very well known in the applied mathematics literature and often referred to as the Johnson-Nédélec coupling JN [42,28,35] and the Bielak-MacCamy coupling BMC [5]. From our point of view JN might be the most natural way to deal with the unbounded domain problem in the framework of a finite element method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other two methods we will discuss in this work are very well known in the applied mathematics literature and often referred to as the Johnson-Nédélec coupling JN [42,28,35] and the Bielak-MacCamy coupling BMC [5]. From our point of view JN might be the most natural way to deal with the unbounded domain problem in the framework of a finite element method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Based on an argument of Sayas [Say09], Steinbach [Ste11] showed that the nonsymmetric coupling of the elliptic-elliptic interface problem with a lowest order term in the interior domain in fact leads to a coercive variational formulation; see also [EOS17]. This allows us to extend the results of [MS87,CES90] to the non-symmetric coupling method on non-smooth domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The review article [43] describes some theoretical validations of the coupling approaches considered in the earlier literature and delicate choices of the coupling interface. The coupling methods in [5,6,31,32,43] lead to very large algebraic systems with both dense and sparse structures. For wave propagation models, given the complexity involved in even separately solving the FEM and BEM algebraic systems, it is efficient to avoid large combined dense and sparse structured systems arising from the coupling methods in [5,6,31,32,43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%