2007
DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33037-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Validity of ICD-9-CM Codes in Identifying Postoperative Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients diagnosed with advanced breast, colorectal, NSCLC, and prostate cancer were linked to administrative data at each site to obtain information on drug utilization, inpatient and outpatient diagnoses, and patient characteristics. The diagnosis codes (primary or secondary) associated with inpatient or outpatient (including emergency department [ [14]. For patients with a diagnosis of VTE, administrative records were queried for purchase(s) or in-office administration of anticoagulant(s).…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients diagnosed with advanced breast, colorectal, NSCLC, and prostate cancer were linked to administrative data at each site to obtain information on drug utilization, inpatient and outpatient diagnoses, and patient characteristics. The diagnosis codes (primary or secondary) associated with inpatient or outpatient (including emergency department [ [14]. For patients with a diagnosis of VTE, administrative records were queried for purchase(s) or in-office administration of anticoagulant(s).…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, measures of deep venous thrombosis from administrative data are feasible to obtain but correlate poorly with data collected from the medical record and require greater resources. 27 It is often difficult to develop and implement measures of patient safety. Such measures should be important to a variety of stakeholders, scientifically sound, feasible, and usable.…”
Section: Evaluating Progress In Patient Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agreement among experts about these diagnoses is poor or unknown. [3][4][5] Also, the different methods (medical record vs discharge data) of identifying events can dramatically influence performance, 5 and aggressive screening strategies can markedly increase case-finding rates without an effect on quality of care. The absence of a standardized surveillance system could lead to a spurious association between more preventable harm and lower-quality care.…”
Section: Complications Should Be Important and Measurablementioning
confidence: 99%