1995
DOI: 10.1107/s010876739400886x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validity of form-factor, modified-form-factor and anomalous-scattering-factor approximations in elastic scattering calculations

Abstract: The validity of form-factor, modified-form-factor and anomalous-scattering-factor approximations in predictions of elastic photon-atom scattering is assessed with the aid of the state-of-the-art numerical calculation of Rayleigh scattering obtained using the second-order Smatrix theory, in the photon energy range from 100 eV to 1 MeV. A comparison is made with predictions from Smatrix theory in the same atomic model for representative low-Z (carbon, Z = 6) and high-Z (lead, Z = 82) elements to get a general id… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
74
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
74
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[8,9] compiled in the DABAX data base [10]. The reduced radial distribution function was then obtained by Fourier transformation…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8,9] compiled in the DABAX data base [10]. The reduced radial distribution function was then obtained by Fourier transformation…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficients κ and κ 0 describe the contraction-expansion for the spherical and multipolar valence densities, respectively. For the structure factor computations, the form factor for the hydrogen atoms was taken from Stewart et al, 31 the form factors for nonhydrogen atoms were calculated from Clementi & Raimondi, 32 and wave functions and the real and imaginary dispersion corrections to the form factors were from Kissel et al 33 Atomic displacement parameters of hydrogen atoms are obtained using the recently described SHADE2 approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in Table 3.1, the energy at which a nuclear Thomson cross section is equal to a Rayleigh scattering cross section increases with increasing Z. However, with larger scattering angles, the form-factor predictions of σ Ray (θ) become increasingly inaccurate [48]. Thus, the energies given in Table 3.1 may be inaccurate, but the general trends remain correct.…”
Section: Nuclear Thomson Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 79%