2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2015.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validity of critical thinking tests for predicting degree performance: A longitudinal study

Abstract: This study explored the validity of using critical thinking tests to predict final psychology degree marks over and above that already predicted by traditional admission exams (A-levels). Participants were a longitudinal sample of 109 psychology students from a university in the United Kingdom. The outcome measures were: total degree marks; and end of year marks. The predictor measures were: university admission exam results (A-levels); critical thinking test scores (skills & dispositions); and non-verbal inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST) has been preferred compared to the other tests for the quality of its questions (Ingle, 2007). A number of studies reported validity of the CCTST for samples of students from United States (Facione, 1990), Iran (Khalili & Zadeh, 2003), and United Kindom (O'Hare & McGuinness, 2015). Instruction, April 2019 • Vol.12, No.2 The current study accepted that critical thinking is a conventional quantitative measure that can be calculated through the use of The California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST) has been preferred compared to the other tests for the quality of its questions (Ingle, 2007). A number of studies reported validity of the CCTST for samples of students from United States (Facione, 1990), Iran (Khalili & Zadeh, 2003), and United Kindom (O'Hare & McGuinness, 2015). Instruction, April 2019 • Vol.12, No.2 The current study accepted that critical thinking is a conventional quantitative measure that can be calculated through the use of The California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Notably, many sources report on the robust validity of the CCTST (Williams et al , 2003; Sorensen and Yankech, 2008; O’Hare and McGuinness, 2015). Reliability tests for the eight subscales resulted in Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 and a Cronbach’s alpha of >0.9 for the overall instrument (Facione and Facione, 1997), scores that indicate a strong instrument (Miller and Salkind, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First year studies require quite different skills from the later years at university [21] and different phases may have different predictors [15]. Some findings show that while secondary school performance predicts later academic achievement at university, the predictive power decreases as studies advance [22]. In the present study, we address this issue by including study records from the first three years of university study and including variables for both study progress and study success.…”
Section: Prior Grades As a Predictor Of Later Academic Achievement Atmentioning
confidence: 97%