2008
DOI: 10.1136/oem.2008.039008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validity and reliability of diagnoses of work-related mental ill-health

Abstract: Objectives: To establish the reliability and validity of work-related mental ill-health diagnoses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a pilot study of 8,500 post sorters working for the post companies, all 546 employees who reported sick in 2003 consulted an OP and a psychiatrist [40]. Between OPs and psychiatrists, an agreement of 81% was found with regard to the group diagnosis of CMDs, confirming the results reported by O'Niell et al[41]. However, the OPs frequently diagnosed distress or adjustment disorders, whereas the psychiatrists more often diagnosed depressive disorders and anxiety disorders.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In a pilot study of 8,500 post sorters working for the post companies, all 546 employees who reported sick in 2003 consulted an OP and a psychiatrist [40]. Between OPs and psychiatrists, an agreement of 81% was found with regard to the group diagnosis of CMDs, confirming the results reported by O'Niell et al[41]. However, the OPs frequently diagnosed distress or adjustment disorders, whereas the psychiatrists more often diagnosed depressive disorders and anxiety disorders.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…O'Niell et al (15) found no systematic difference between OP and psychiatrists in their diagnostic labelling of mental ill-health, although within-group reliabilities were low for some diagnoses, particularly 'stress'. We limited potential diagnostic misclassification by using main ICD-10 (eg, 'neurotic disorders') instead of specific (eg, burnout, adjustment disorder, or anxiety disorder) diagnoses.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, more studies are needed to confirm these findings in other settings and countries, Strengths and Weaknesses of the Study An asset of this study was the large number of employees included in the occupational health service register and the availability of recorded SA data free from recall bias [37][38][39]. Although the validity of mental diagnoses in occupational medicine is still being discussed [40], the use of OP-certified SA is better than relying on employee-reported mental health. In a pilot study among 8,500 post sorters working for the Dutch Postal Services, all 546 employees who reported sick in 2003 consulted an OP and a psychiatrist.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%