The validity and reliability of the Stoma Self‐Efficacy Scale: A methodological study

Karaçay, Pelin; Yigitoglu, Eylem Toğluk; Karadağ, Ayişe

doi:10.1111/ijn.12840

Cited by 12 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For the grading of the scale, the lowest score is 22, and the highest is 110. The high score gained from each item of the scale shows a high level of self-efficacy [ 26 ]. In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha value is 0,965.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of self-efficacy levels of patients with intestinal stoma on stoma adaptation

Özden

Kılıç

2023

Support Care Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objection This study was conducted to examine the effect of self-efficacy levels on stoma adaptation in patients with intestinal stoma. Methods The study was planned as descriptive and analytical and was carried out in the university adult hospital general surgery stoma and wound care unit. Sixty-two patients with intestinal stoma who met the admission criteria were included in the study. Ethics committee approval, institutional permission and patient consent were obtained for the study. Data were collected from June to September 2021 using the Descriptive Feature Information Form, the Self Efficacy Scale for Individuals with Ostomy, and the Ostomy Adjustment Inventory (OAI-23). Data were analyzed by number, percentage, mean, standard deviation, Mann Whitney U, t test, ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation, and linear regression analysis tests. Results The mean age of the patients with intestinal stoma who participated in our study was 53.12 ± 12.30 years; 71% of them were women, 83.9% were married, and 32.2% were primary and secondary school graduates. The duration of stoma was 8.45 ± 4.69 months, 80.6% of them were opened due to cancer, and 54.8% of them had temporary colostomy. There was a weak and significant correlation between the duration of stoma of the patients and their self-efficacy and stoma adaptation, and as their self-efficacy levels increased, their stoma adaptation increased ( p < .05). Conclusions Self-efficacy is one of the important factors affecting patients’ adaptation with the stoma. For this reason, it is recommended to plan trainings to support the self-efficacy levels of patients and to conduct interventional studies in this direction.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of self-efficacy levels of patients with intestinal stoma on stoma adaptation

Özden

Kılıç

2023

Support Care Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This scale was developed by Bekkers et al with the aim of evaluating the self-efficacy of people with stoma [20] and a Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Karaçay et al [21]. The 22-item scale uses a five-point Likert scale for evaluation.…”

Section: Stoma Self-efficacy Scalementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Possible scores for the scale range from 22 to 110, and higher scores indicate better stoma self-efficacy. In the validity and reliability study of the scale, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.95 [21]. In this study, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale was set as 0.92.…”

Section: Stoma Self-efficacy Scalementioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of stoma self‐efficacy of people with stoma on their sexual function and satisfaction

Yilmaz Sezer,

Aker,

Öner Cengiz

et al. 2023

Colorectal Disease

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimThe aim of this research is to determine the effect of stoma self‐efficacy of people with stoma on their sexual function and satisfaction.MethodThis descriptive research was carried out between November 2022 and May 2023. One hundred and forty people with stoma were included in the research. A descriptive information form, a visual analogue scale (VAS) for satisfaction with sexual life, the Stoma Self‐Efficacy Scale (Stoma SE) and the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX) were used for the research.ResultsAccording to the findings of the research, it was established that 90% of the participants had sexual dysfunction according to the ASEX. The average VAS satisfaction with sexual life score was 2.77 ± 3.19, the average Stoma SE Total score was 76.26 ± 19.63 and the average ASEX score was 21.62 ± 7.88. The VAS‐satisfaction with sexual life score of the participants had a positive relationship with the social self‐efficacy score and a negative relationship with the ASEX score. There was a negative relationship between the social self‐efficacy score and the ASEX score of the participants. It has been determined that the social self‐efficacy scores of the participants affect their ASEX and VAS‐satisfaction with sexual life scores.ConclusionDevelopment of care self‐efficacy is as critical as the development of social self‐efficacy for people with stoma. Development of social self‐efficacy by people with stoma can contribute to their sexual function and satisfaction with sexual life.

show abstract

“…Among the quality of life indicators for the stoma patients, the stoma quality of life‐related scale will be the most direct indicator of the stoma condition. The stoma quality of life scale 15 and stoma self‐efficacy scale 16 are the most representative scales of stoma quality of life‐related field. The lack of involvement of a wound ostomy care nurse might increase the risk of developing stoma complications, which might be associated with poorer quality of life 17 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The comparison between experimental nursing and routine nursing interventions on the quality of life of stoma patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Guo

Zhang²,

Guo³

et al. 2022

International Wound Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The advance in nursing care for stoma patients is a challenging issue, which will influence the life quality. The quality of life is a major issue in the recovery of stoma patients. The evidence of experimental nursing has not been explored enough. A systematic search and a meta‐analysis were performed for the studies of experimental nursing interventions versus routine warming interventions on patients with a stoma. The comparisons between nursing interventions were performed to find which kind of intervention will be superior in improving life quality. After a restricted selection, 10 studies, 460 subjects with experimental nursing intervention, and 478 controls with the routine nursing intervention were enrolled in a variety of causes of the stoma. The focused outcome was the quality of life. The meta‐analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.4. Among the stoma patients, the meta‐analysis favours the experimental nursing intervention group with higher scores of life quality when compared to the routine nursing intervention group. The meta‐analysis results were with positive mean differences, significant tests for overall effect, and significant heterogeneities in the random‐effects model. The experimental nursing intervention showed higher positive effects on the quality of life when compared to routine nursing intervention for stoma patients. Experimental nursing intervention might be an option for stoma nursing practitioners to improve stoma care.

show abstract

The validity and reliability of the Stoma Self‐Efficacy Scale: A methodological study

Cited by 12 publications

References 20 publications

The effect of self-efficacy levels of patients with intestinal stoma on stoma adaptation

The effect of self-efficacy levels of patients with intestinal stoma on stoma adaptation

The effect of stoma self‐efficacy of people with stoma on their sexual function and satisfaction

The comparison between experimental nursing and routine nursing interventions on the quality of life of stoma patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About