2014
DOI: 10.1177/0004867413520049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validity and reliability of the observed clinical interview (OCI) exams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The OCI was removed in part due to the difficulty in establishing reliability across a single assessment. [18][19][20][21] It was deemed unwise to retain an examination with reliability concerns. Furthermore, the feasibility and cost of conducting the OCI had also proved problematic as expanding numbers of trainees required additional independent examiners (candidates passing one out of three OCIs on two occasions have required 12 examiners), additional patients (new to the candidate) and additional costs.…”
Section: Formative Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OCI was removed in part due to the difficulty in establishing reliability across a single assessment. [18][19][20][21] It was deemed unwise to retain an examination with reliability concerns. Furthermore, the feasibility and cost of conducting the OCI had also proved problematic as expanding numbers of trainees required additional independent examiners (candidates passing one out of three OCIs on two occasions have required 12 examiners), additional patients (new to the candidate) and additional costs.…”
Section: Formative Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue, along with poor pass rates, was noted by the Australian Medical Council. 4 Another concern has been poor reproducibility (criterion validity). Passing one long case type examination does not predict performance in another.…”
Section: A Case For Changementioning
confidence: 99%