2016
DOI: 10.5430/jha.v5n4p1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validation of the Western Canada Waiting List Children’s Mental Health-Priority Criteria Score Instrument: 2002 – 2015 results

Abstract: Objective: To assess the validity of the Western Canada Waiting List Children's Mental Health-Priority Criteria Score (WCWL-CMH-PCS) Instrument. Methods: The WCWL-CMH-PCS Instrument was developed in order to prioritize the delivery of child and youth mental health (CYMH) services through standardized measures of urgency. We draw on two data sets describing the PCS scores among patients who have sought CYMH care. The first data set was collected during the first phase of pilot testing for the WCWL-CMH-PCS Instr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement system employed in the CanREACH evaluation has been shown to integrate well into clinical practice and, in and of itself, to be valid, reliable, and economical. [8][9][10] This method of clinical practice measurement has been shown to inform guidelines in respect to clinical screening, assessment, and illustrated the need for a practice paradigm shift in respect to trauma-informed care assessment, diagnosis and treatment planning. 11,12 In addition to mapping onto the recent provincial SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Rewarding, and Timely), a the method underpinning the clinical measurement in this paper has been generalized into a model applicable to any division of medical practice and education, 13 a model recently reviewed in Family Medicine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement system employed in the CanREACH evaluation has been shown to integrate well into clinical practice and, in and of itself, to be valid, reliable, and economical. [8][9][10] This method of clinical practice measurement has been shown to inform guidelines in respect to clinical screening, assessment, and illustrated the need for a practice paradigm shift in respect to trauma-informed care assessment, diagnosis and treatment planning. 11,12 In addition to mapping onto the recent provincial SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Rewarding, and Timely), a the method underpinning the clinical measurement in this paper has been generalized into a model applicable to any division of medical practice and education, 13 a model recently reviewed in Family Medicine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical referral data included demographics (age and sex) and system indicators (eg, emergent, scheduled, and repeat admissions, the length of stay, wait times, etc). In addition to demographic and system variables, clinical variables related to urgency captured on referral were based on the WCWL-CMH-PCS 13 and the admission and discharge variables captured in the measurable treatment plan, function and problem severity. 12 14 15 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One advantage of the CAAMPP regional system of care is its embedded system of clinical measurement. [12][13][14][15] On this basis, it is possible to compare innovations in service delivery at a system level to established standards of care in terms of patients' clinical profiles and outcomes. In this paper we examined the impact of the AAH service on admission and readmission rates in comparison to emergency and inpatient admissions not enrolled to AAH under the main hypothesis that the admission and readmission rates and lengths of stay for those exposed to AAH will improve (reduce and shorten).…”
Section: Setting and Aah Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the clinical profiles of those admitted to AAH are at least equivalent to the comparison groups representing the current standards of care. 14,15…”
Section: Setting and Aah Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation