2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The vaginal cylinder: Misunderstood, misused, or trivial? An in-depth dosimetric and multiinstitutional outcome investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study including 304 EC patients treated with BT, there was a significant association between cylinder diameter and vaginal stenosis (10). In a recently published study, an increased stenosis rate was associated with a deeper prescription point ( p = 0.005) and longer treatment length ( p = 0.01) [ 26 ]. Since 2003 the patients in our hospital have been treated with a larger cylinder diameter, usually of 3.5 m and with a treatment source length of 2.5 cm, and patients are strongly encouraged to use vaginal dilators which could explain the low rate of G2 complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study including 304 EC patients treated with BT, there was a significant association between cylinder diameter and vaginal stenosis (10). In a recently published study, an increased stenosis rate was associated with a deeper prescription point ( p = 0.005) and longer treatment length ( p = 0.01) [ 26 ]. Since 2003 the patients in our hospital have been treated with a larger cylinder diameter, usually of 3.5 m and with a treatment source length of 2.5 cm, and patients are strongly encouraged to use vaginal dilators which could explain the low rate of G2 complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kloetzer et al observed no difference in survival or vaginal recurrence treating only proximal half of the vagina [17]. Surprisingly, one analysis found that overall recurrence was correlated with increased prescription length, though this was not discussed in the paper, and it was most likely due to differences in disease [14]. We found a significant difference in vaginal cuff recurrence between patients treated with an AL of 1 and 2 cm (5-year recurrence rates of 11.5% and 0.9%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The length of vagina irradiation is known to be associated with vaginal shortening and stenosis [13,35]. A recent analysis showed stenosis rates of 5% and 31%, with prescription lengths of 2.5 cm and 5.0 cm, respectively [14]. This same analysis found that stenosis rates correlated significantly with prescription depth (4% vs. 21% at the surface and 5 mm, respectively), but not with cylinder diameter, which, unlike prescription point and length, physicians tend to alter based on individual anatomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations