2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30738-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The UV/Visible Radiation Boundary Region (385–405 nm) Damages Skin Cells and Induces “dark” Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimers in Human Skin in vivo

Abstract: The adverse effects of terrestrial solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) (~295–400 nm) on the skin are well documented, especially in the UVB region (~295–320 nm). The effects of very long-wave UVA (>380 nm) and visible radiation (≥400 nm) are much less known. Sunscreens have been beneficial in inhibiting a wide range of photodamage, however most formulations provide very little protection in the long wave UVA region (380–400 nm) and almost none from shortwave visible wavelengths (400–420 nm). We demonstrate photo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
91
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(68 reference statements)
4
91
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study in melanocytes [6] documented that CPDs continued to increase by 50% or more after irradiation ended, in the dark and independent of additional UVR photons. More recently, CPD formation in the dark (now referred to as dark-CPDs) was also reported to occur in keratinocytes not only in vitro but also in vivo in human skin at measurable levels within the first 2 h after exposure to UVA/visible radiation [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study in melanocytes [6] documented that CPDs continued to increase by 50% or more after irradiation ended, in the dark and independent of additional UVR photons. More recently, CPD formation in the dark (now referred to as dark-CPDs) was also reported to occur in keratinocytes not only in vitro but also in vivo in human skin at measurable levels within the first 2 h after exposure to UVA/visible radiation [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to dermatology, the clinical relevance of high‐energy visible light (HEVIS) induced ROS effects on ocular tissues, in particular the retina, has been acknowledged much earlier, prompting questions regarding potentially harmful effects on sun‐exposed skin . Recently, UV/VIS (385‐405 nm) was reported to induce delayed CPD formation in vivo . In contrast to other wavelengths of VIS, HEVIS exposure leads to a significant decrease in viability of different skin cell lines and more pronounced shrinkage of the extracellular matrix (ECM) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Recently, UV/VIS (385-405 nm) was reported to induce delayed CPD formation in vivo. 13 In contrast to other wavelengths of VIS, HEVIS exposure leads to a significant decrease in viability of different skin cell lines and more pronounced shrinkage of the extracellular matrix (ECM). [14][15][16] Like UVA, HEVIS appears to exert its effects mainly through the generation of ROS, accounting for a substantial part of the amount generated by natural midday sunlight in human skin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible consequence of this is increased exposure to solar visible and infrared radiation. There is increasing evidence that these spectral regions have adverse effects on skin, especially photoageing …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%