2002
DOI: 10.5194/acp-2-227-2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The UV-visible absorption cross-sections of IONO<sub>2</sub>

Abstract: Abstract. The UV-visible absorption spectrum of gaseous IONO 2 has been measured over the wavelength range 245-415 nm using the technique of laser photolysis with timeresolved UV-visible absorption spectroscopy. IONO 2 was produced in situ in the gas phase by laser flash photolysis of NO 2 /CF 3 I/N 2 mixtures. Post flash spectra were deconvolved to remove contributions to the observed absorption from other reactant and product species. The resulting spectrum attributed to IONO 2 consists of several overlappin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In scenario 2, most of the iodine in the gas phase forms IONO 2 through . As discussed by Kaltsoyannis and Plane [2008], the other known mechanisms for recycling IONO 2 , photolysis to I + NO 3 using either of the literature cross sections [ Joseph et al , 2007; Mössinger et al , 2002], thermal decomposition (to IO + NO 2 ), or uptake into aerosol and emission as IBr and ICl, are not fast enough to compensate for the removal by . IO would then be significantly below the observed concentrations (Figure 3), and I 2 would be below the DOAS detection limit.…”
Section: Discussion and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In scenario 2, most of the iodine in the gas phase forms IONO 2 through . As discussed by Kaltsoyannis and Plane [2008], the other known mechanisms for recycling IONO 2 , photolysis to I + NO 3 using either of the literature cross sections [ Joseph et al , 2007; Mössinger et al , 2002], thermal decomposition (to IO + NO 2 ), or uptake into aerosol and emission as IBr and ICl, are not fast enough to compensate for the removal by . IO would then be significantly below the observed concentrations (Figure 3), and I 2 would be below the DOAS detection limit.…”
Section: Discussion and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7, For the yield, see Davis et al [1996]. 8, The recently measured IONO 2 cross section from Mössinger et al [2002] is used. 9, Absorption cross section according to Rowley et al [1999].…”
Section: Inferring Total Gaseous Stratospheric Iodinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At stratospheric temperatures, the rate coefficient for reaction (R10) is uncertain by a factor of 2, i.e., for p = 100 mbar, and T = 220 K, the error limits given by DeMore et al [1997] suggest a rate coefficient in the range of 2.3 to 8.5 Â 10 À12 cm 3 /s with a recommended value of 4.6 Â 10 À12 cm 3 /s. Here the recently measured IONO 2 spectrum from Mössinger et al [2002] is taken, and the combined uncertainties of the cross section and actinic flux is taken into account by tuning its photolysis rate by ±50% in the model. Evidently, the combined uncertainties of the formation reaction (R10) and photolysis determine the IONO 2 /IO ratio with the lower photolysis rate and the upper limit of reaction (R10) determining the inferred I y upper limits.…”
Section: Inferring Total Gaseous Stratospheric Iodinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uptake is followed by hydrolysis to HNO 3 and HOI (aq) that is then available for iodine release as described in RM2, RM3 and RM5. At Mace Head, a lifetime of INO 3 with respect to heterogeneous uptake on sea salt aerosols was found to be 10 hours [ Mössinger et al , 2002].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%