2018
DOI: 10.4314/gjpas.v24i1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utilization of synthetic methionine in broiler chicken production: effect on growth performance, blood and carcass characteristics

Abstract: An 8-week feeding trial was carried out to evaluate the effect of graded levels of synthetic methionine on the growth performance, blood and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. A total of 120 day-old chicks of Amobyn strain with mean body weight of 36.67g were randomly divided into four groups of 30 chicks each to constitute treatments T 1 (0% control), T 2 (0.20% methionine), T 3 (0.40% methionine) and T 4 (0.60% methionine), respectively. Each group was further divided into three replicates of 10 bi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in table (2) of live body weight, weight gain and FCR obtained in this study are consistent with the results of (Cadirci and Koncagul, 2014) who were found that significant results (P ≤ 0.05) observed in these traits when adding liquid methionine at different levels, as well as consistent with what the researchers found in the amount of feed consumed as there were no significant differences between the treatments in this trait The results of live body weight, feed intake, body weight gain and FCR are consistent with what (Salary et al, 2015) found in their study on different sources and forms of methionine, where they showed an enhancement in FCR in the treatments in which methionine was added to feed or water compared to the treatment in which methionine was not added. The results of the quantity of consumed feed and FCR in this study did not agree with what (Ozung et al, 2018) has found, as the results obtained from his study showed that there were significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) between the treatment birds in which different percentages of liquid methionine were added. These results indicate that the way of distributing methionine (in feed or water) is indifferent from the argument of view of sustaining requirements for the broiler chicks' performance (Rehman et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The results in table (2) of live body weight, weight gain and FCR obtained in this study are consistent with the results of (Cadirci and Koncagul, 2014) who were found that significant results (P ≤ 0.05) observed in these traits when adding liquid methionine at different levels, as well as consistent with what the researchers found in the amount of feed consumed as there were no significant differences between the treatments in this trait The results of live body weight, feed intake, body weight gain and FCR are consistent with what (Salary et al, 2015) found in their study on different sources and forms of methionine, where they showed an enhancement in FCR in the treatments in which methionine was added to feed or water compared to the treatment in which methionine was not added. The results of the quantity of consumed feed and FCR in this study did not agree with what (Ozung et al, 2018) has found, as the results obtained from his study showed that there were significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) between the treatment birds in which different percentages of liquid methionine were added. These results indicate that the way of distributing methionine (in feed or water) is indifferent from the argument of view of sustaining requirements for the broiler chicks' performance (Rehman et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%