2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.11.724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Utilization of Animal Product-Free Media and Autologous Serum in an Autologous Dermal Substitute Culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…*0.01 \ p \ 0.05, **p \ 0.01; no asterisk means no significant difference (after applying for Bonferroni correction). Error bar means SD (N = 9) Cytotechnology (2015) 67:507-514 511 to Eagle's minimal essential medium: HEPES, L-glutamine, lipids, sodium bicarbonate, sodium selenite, gentamicin sulfate, non-essential amino acids, recombinant human insulin, recombinant human epidermal growth factor, dexamethasone, and synthetic polymer (Itoh and Hoshi 2005;Yamada et al 2006;Morimoto et al 2011;Takami et al 2008). It contains no animal-derived components and is thought to promote a normal fibroblast phenotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…*0.01 \ p \ 0.05, **p \ 0.01; no asterisk means no significant difference (after applying for Bonferroni correction). Error bar means SD (N = 9) Cytotechnology (2015) 67:507-514 511 to Eagle's minimal essential medium: HEPES, L-glutamine, lipids, sodium bicarbonate, sodium selenite, gentamicin sulfate, non-essential amino acids, recombinant human insulin, recombinant human epidermal growth factor, dexamethasone, and synthetic polymer (Itoh and Hoshi 2005;Yamada et al 2006;Morimoto et al 2011;Takami et al 2008). It contains no animal-derived components and is thought to promote a normal fibroblast phenotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) plus fetal bovine serum (FBS) is usually used for human fibroblast culture (Rittié and Fisher 2005). An autologous serum can be used in place of FBS (Itoh and Hoshi 2005;Yamada et al 2006;Nishi et al 2010;Morimoto et al 2011). Fibroblasts cultured with serum have a high proliferative capacity, similar to that of keloids; however, human fibroblasts in living dermis rarely proliferate and maintain homeostasis of the dermis through collagen production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They demonstrated increasing both cell quantity, purity and reducing probable common risks. At the present study, we used human autologous serum instead of FBS similar to some of previous studies (Kamil et al 2007;Mazlyzam et al 2008;Morimoto et al 2010). There are some types of pharmagrade FBS in the country that are safer than others, but according to previous description in clinical grade procedures, the utilization of xeno-free media is the first priority of the cell manufacturer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FDA approved some products with animal components have been safely used in humans, however, long-term hypothetical rejection and immunological reaction issues could be minimized and/or eliminated by the use of animal-free serum (Kamil et al 2007). Therefore, it is expected of culture cells which are intended to cell therapy under specific conditions and utilization of xeno-free media and serum such as human serum for achieving more safety (Lopez and De Vries 1999;Mizuno et al 2006;Mazlyzam et al 2008;Pytlik et al 2009;Morimoto et al 2010). The most important difference between this study and others is that we tried to do it as a clinical grade Schwann cell cultivation under a clean condition and avoiding the use of FBS, growth factors and cell passaging to achieve high level biosafety standards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42][43][44] Compare to PRP technology, isolating autologous GFs by PRF technology is considered simpler; it also contains various GF types which required for stimulation of healing processes as shown in our experiment. Similar result has been reported by Jørgensen et al, 45 in their pilot study where PRF has also effective for recalcitrant chronic wound.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%