2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utility of transient sensitivity for wildlife management and conservation: Bison as a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recognition that inference about population dynamics depends on the time‐scale of observation has gained traction in conservation biology and ecology more generally (Hastings ; Buhnerkempe et al . ) but is not yet widely appreciated in disease ecology. We postulate that this is largely due to a historical focus on the basic reproduction number, R 0 (the expected number of secondary infections caused by a single infectious individual in a wholly susceptible population), which is typically estimated during initial invasion of a population or at a long‐term steady state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recognition that inference about population dynamics depends on the time‐scale of observation has gained traction in conservation biology and ecology more generally (Hastings ; Buhnerkempe et al . ) but is not yet widely appreciated in disease ecology. We postulate that this is largely due to a historical focus on the basic reproduction number, R 0 (the expected number of secondary infections caused by a single infectious individual in a wholly susceptible population), which is typically estimated during initial invasion of a population or at a long‐term steady state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a unique combination of experimental exclosure and space-use studies, however, our colleagues are finding that competition between bison and cattle for forage on the HM is minimal under recent environmental conditions (Ranglack et al 2015; H. Ranglack and J. T. du Toit, unpublished manuscript); perhaps because cattle must remain near limited sources of water, while bison can range more freely (van Vuren 2001). Complex interactions between climate, phenology, and primary productivity, as well as transient fluctuations in age and sex structure induced by extractions (Buhnerkempe et al 2011) might help explain greater amounts of variability in bison population dynamics in the HM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managers should remain cognizant of the large influence that culling and changes in survival can have on bison population dynamics (Buhnerkempe et al 2011;Fuller et al 2007b), but the strong response of bison recruitment to changes in population density and precipitation might contribute more to population growth on an annual basis than subtle changes in natural mortality of adults (Gaillard and Yoccoz 2003). Changes in precipitation regimes could thus have strong effects on the management of bison populations in arid and semiarid environments (Holmgren et al 2006), especially in areas like the HM where cattle and bison share forage resources (van Vuren and Bray 1983).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%