The Utility of the SYNTAX Score II and SYNTAX Score 2020 for Identifying Patients with Three-Vessel Disease Eligible for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Multivessel TALENT Trial: A Prospective Pilot Experience
Abstract:Background: Personalized prognosis plays a vital role in deciding between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with three-vessel disease (3VD). The aim of this study is to compare the modality of revascularization chosen by the local heart team to that recommended by using individualized predictions of medium, and long-term all-cause mortality amongst patients with 3VD screened in the Multivessel TALENT trial. Methods: The SYNTAX score II (SS-II) and S… Show more
“…В самое последнее время шкала Syntax Score II была вновь переработана и повторно откалибрована после интеграции показателей долгосрочной смертности от всех причин у пациентов, вошедших в исследование Syntax [14]. В обновленной Syntax Score 2020 используются 2 модификатора оригинальной Syntax Score и 7 клинических прогностических факторов: возраст, сахарный диабет, ХОБЛ, заболевание периферических сосудов, курение в настоящее время, клиренс креатинина и ФВ ЛЖ.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…В обновленной Syntax Score 2020 используются 2 модификатора оригинальной Syntax Score и 7 клинических прогностических факторов: возраст, сахарный диабет, ХОБЛ, заболевание периферических сосудов, курение в настоящее время, клиренс креатинина и ФВ ЛЖ. Данная обновленная шкала предназначена для более точного суждения об оптимальном выборе реваскуляризации для пациента с учетом 5-и 10-летнего риска развития крупных кардиальных и цереброваскулярных событий и риска смерти от всех причин [14].…”
There has been an increase in the population of elderly patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) in recent years. Elderly and, especially, senile patients typically have comorbid conditions, multivessel coronary artery disease and coronary calcification, which make treatment more challenging. The available data from evidence-based medicine is not enough to determine the best treatment strategies for elderly patients, because large randomized clinical trials usually do not include elderly individuals with severe comorbidities. In the presented case, an 80-year-old patient with severe calcification and multivessel coronary artery disease experienced recurrent dissection of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and stent thrombosis of the left main coronary artery (LMCA) during the second phase of percutaneous coronary intervention, which required the implantation of 8 stents and administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, leading to the clinical manifestation of gastrointestinal bleeding. An important feature of the presented case was the necessity to implant a large number of stents, which is a risk factor for restenosis. Various issues are discussed in this case, including the choice of optimal management strategy for an 80-year-old patient with multivessel coronary artery disease. Physicians had to make difficult decisions to achieve a balance between potential benefit and risk. In order to improve the management of elderly patients, further research is needed, as well as the accumulation and discussion of clinical data.
“…В самое последнее время шкала Syntax Score II была вновь переработана и повторно откалибрована после интеграции показателей долгосрочной смертности от всех причин у пациентов, вошедших в исследование Syntax [14]. В обновленной Syntax Score 2020 используются 2 модификатора оригинальной Syntax Score и 7 клинических прогностических факторов: возраст, сахарный диабет, ХОБЛ, заболевание периферических сосудов, курение в настоящее время, клиренс креатинина и ФВ ЛЖ.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…В обновленной Syntax Score 2020 используются 2 модификатора оригинальной Syntax Score и 7 клинических прогностических факторов: возраст, сахарный диабет, ХОБЛ, заболевание периферических сосудов, курение в настоящее время, клиренс креатинина и ФВ ЛЖ. Данная обновленная шкала предназначена для более точного суждения об оптимальном выборе реваскуляризации для пациента с учетом 5-и 10-летнего риска развития крупных кардиальных и цереброваскулярных событий и риска смерти от всех причин [14].…”
There has been an increase in the population of elderly patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) in recent years. Elderly and, especially, senile patients typically have comorbid conditions, multivessel coronary artery disease and coronary calcification, which make treatment more challenging. The available data from evidence-based medicine is not enough to determine the best treatment strategies for elderly patients, because large randomized clinical trials usually do not include elderly individuals with severe comorbidities. In the presented case, an 80-year-old patient with severe calcification and multivessel coronary artery disease experienced recurrent dissection of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and stent thrombosis of the left main coronary artery (LMCA) during the second phase of percutaneous coronary intervention, which required the implantation of 8 stents and administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, leading to the clinical manifestation of gastrointestinal bleeding. An important feature of the presented case was the necessity to implant a large number of stents, which is a risk factor for restenosis. Various issues are discussed in this case, including the choice of optimal management strategy for an 80-year-old patient with multivessel coronary artery disease. Physicians had to make difficult decisions to achieve a balance between potential benefit and risk. In order to improve the management of elderly patients, further research is needed, as well as the accumulation and discussion of clinical data.
“…Well-designed decision aids that present patients with all contemporary therapeutic options may be useful adjuncts to practice in many complex medical situations [ 12 ]. The presentation of balanced options with a PDA might suggest that medical science has not fully determined what the best treatment option is [ 13 , 14 , 15 ], a recognition that can be upsetting to patients, who may seek a second opinion from a more confident, if less patient-oriented, medical professional.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.