The Utility of External Performance Measurement Tools in Program Evaluation

Abstract

Many rehabilitation hospitals use formal measurement tools to evaluate program performance. A potential advantage to using the Functional Independence Measure instrument through the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (UDSMR) is that it provides information that allows an institution to compare its level of performance to those of other facilities. To assess whether joining UDSMR, along with an institution's continuous quality improvement efforts, could be associated with improved program performance, the records of a rehabilitation hospital's internal inpatient Program Evaluation System (PES) were reviewed for 6 fiscal years (1990-1995). Quality improvement efforts during 1995 (during which a 51% improvement in length of stay efficiency was noted) included education for staff, feedback on team performance, and efforts to formulate clinical pathways. Although external measures of performance do not have a direct effect on quality improvement, they could help identify areas of potential improvement that might not be appreciated when internal assessment systems are used alone.

A Preliminary Survey of Interprofessional Education

“…Many of the studies reviewed lacked controls and failed to set adequate outcome criteria. [25][26][27][28][29] Most were little more than reports of student satisfaction. The small number of studies that did include control groups suggested that, under favorable circumstances, interactive learning methods did not conclusively improve students' perceptions of other health care disciplines.…”

A Program Evaluation Study for Measurement and Evaluation Course in Distance Education

“…In these studies, researchers evaluate applications for using program-based measurement and evaluation in different disciplines in the historical process. Another type of study in which the concepts of measurement and evaluation and program evaluation are a matter of research is studies that adopt the use of measurement and evaluation in program evaluation (Harmon et al, 1998;McDowell, 1992;Tusing & Breikjern, 2017). These studies include various measurement and evaluation approaches and methods researchers can employ in the program evaluation process.…”