2020
DOI: 10.1002/pd.5650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utility of exome sequencing for fetal pleural effusions

Abstract: Objective: We sought to evaluate the performance of exome sequencing (ES) in determining an underlying genetic etiology for cases of fetal pleural effusions. Study design: We examined a prospective cohort series of fetal pleural effusions visualized sonographically between 1 April 2016 and 31 August 2017. Fetal pleural effusions attributed to twin sharing, anemia, or structural anomalies were excluded, as were all cases with a genetic diagnosis established by karyotype or chromosomal microarray analysis. The r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the lower detection rate of ES (16.7%) might be due to the fact that most of the cases were primary hydrothorax, which was caused by erroneous lymphatic formation and reabsorption and was rarely associated with genetic diseases. In a recent study, Jelin et al [23] performed ES in 6 cases with unexplained pleural effusions, and a pathogenic variant was identified in 1 case (16.7%), which was consistent with our study. Furthermore, in the present study, ES results were all negative in neonatal survivors, while the proportion of abnormal ES in neonatal death was as high as 60%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In our study, the lower detection rate of ES (16.7%) might be due to the fact that most of the cases were primary hydrothorax, which was caused by erroneous lymphatic formation and reabsorption and was rarely associated with genetic diseases. In a recent study, Jelin et al [23] performed ES in 6 cases with unexplained pleural effusions, and a pathogenic variant was identified in 1 case (16.7%), which was consistent with our study. Furthermore, in the present study, ES results were all negative in neonatal survivors, while the proportion of abnormal ES in neonatal death was as high as 60%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Becher (2020) 26 Boissel (2018) 18 Corsten-Janssen (2020) 32 Croonen (2013) 33 Deden (2020) 27 Deng (2020) 19 Greenbaum (2019) 28 Jelin (2020) 20 Lord (2019) 8 Mone (2020) 34 Normand (2018) 21 Petrovski (2019) 16 Sparks (2019) 29 Sparks (2020) 2 Stals (2018) 23 Vora (2017) 22 Westerfield (2015) 30 Westphal (2019) 24 Yang (2012) 31 Yates (2017) 25 Zhou (2020 Study or subgroup Becher (2020) 26 Corsten-Janssen (2020) 32 Deden (2020) 27 Deng (2020) 19 Greenbaum (2019) 28 Jelin (2020) 20 Lord (2019) 8 Mone (2020) 34 0 25 109 109 100.0% 0.21 (0.13, 0.30) Total (95% CI)…”
Section: Study or Subgroupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test for overall effect: Z = 5.15 (P < 0.00001) Heterogeneity: tau 2 = 0.00; chi 2 = 4.75, df = 11 (P = 0.94); I 2 = 0% -0.5 1.8% 6.3% Stals (2018) 23 Westerfield (2015) 30 Westphal (2019) 24 Zhou (2020) 17 Corsten-Janssen (2020) 32 Study or subgroup Boissel (2018) 18 Deden (2020) 27 Deng (2020) 19 Greenbaum (2019) 28 Jelin (2020) 20 Lord (2019) 8 Mone (2020) 34 Petrovski (2019) 16 Sparks (2020) 2 0 45 109 109 100.0% 0.39 (0.30, 0.49) Total (95% CI)…”
Section: Total Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations