2016
DOI: 10.3109/07435800.2015.1120744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study

Abstract: It can be concluded that QUS variables, particularly BUA, and FRAX® major osteoporotic fracture probability without BMD are good candidates for the identification of both hip and distal forearm fractures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early and accurate fracture risk assessment remains an important topic in the management of PMOP . Although the World Health Organization developed a tool of Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX) to generally predict the fracture probability during 10 years, it is still necessary to establish an individualized risk estimation aiming at the specific PMOP patients in a specific institution. In this study, we investigated multiple blood routine biomarkers in relation to the risk of fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early and accurate fracture risk assessment remains an important topic in the management of PMOP . Although the World Health Organization developed a tool of Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX) to generally predict the fracture probability during 10 years, it is still necessary to establish an individualized risk estimation aiming at the specific PMOP patients in a specific institution. In this study, we investigated multiple blood routine biomarkers in relation to the risk of fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in the UK Biobank, quantitative ultrasound was used to assess BMD of the heel in nearly the total sample, whereas DXA measurements in the hip/spine were performed only in a subset of participants. Nevertheless, associations between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, well-established risk factors for osteoporosisand increased fracture risk have been previously shown 45,46.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone density determination plays the biggest role in the study of bone health. Besides the clinical gold standard dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is an established alternative to estimate bone density and predict osteoporotic fractures ( Bauer et al, 1997 ; Khaw et al, 2004 ; Chan et al, 2013 ; Hollaender et al, 2009 ; Olszynski et al, 2013 ; Esmaeilzadeh et al, 2016 ) in specific study settings ( Krieg et al, 2003 ; Gluer, 2008 ). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) validated QUS as being a good predictor for hip and other non-vertebral fractures and as reliable as DXA ( Marín et al, 2006 ; Moayyeri et al, 2012 ; Krieg et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%